Symantec Proxy Review

Stable, and scales to our requirements


What is our primary use case?

We are resellers and we provide solutions to our customers.

We use Symantec Proxy for a forward proxy.

What needs improvement?

The technical support should be improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using Symantec Proxy for one year.

The version we are using is SG200.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's a stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We are a small enterprise and haven't had to option to scale. We didn't have any requirements to scale. We have 1,000 users in our organization.

We operate around the clock, in shifts.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support is an area that requires some improvement. I would rate them a four out of ten.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Licensing is based on a subscription.

Currently, we have a subscription for three years.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.

I am still new to this solution, and learning, for now, I would rate Symantec Proxy an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises

Which version of this solution are you currently using?

SG200
**Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
More Symantec Proxy reviews from users
...who compared it with Blue Coat ProxySG [EOL]
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, F5, Allot and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: September 2021.
536,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user
Guest