IBM MQ Initial Setup
We have it on-premises. We're not using it on a public cloud currently, but it can be deployed there.
The initial deployment takes hours. There's a lot of manual scripting involved. So, Ideally, some kind of automation for that process would be helpful.
View full review »Initial deployment is very simple. You don't need someone who is very technical to configure it, unless you are establishing a new environment or a server, or infrastructure as a service. If you're upgrading things, it's very easy.
We use one support engineer for maintenance. They monitor the server and infrastructure.
View full review »MB
Mat Brudar
Senior Developer at a media company with 10,001+ employees
Setting up MQ is straightforward. Generally, installing MQ isn't a big deal. It's a simple product. The magic happens when you go configure the topology and do some performance tuning.
I work for a huge company, so the deployment is done by DevOps. We're on the application side. The installation was dodgy in versions 5 or 6, but now you just drop a container. We try to automate as much as possible, so we wrote extended Jenkins jobs to flash install all the virtual machinesWe don't deploy MQ on the cloud, but I'm thinking of migrating it to Azure. I see no benefit in a private cloud.
Buyer's Guide
IBM MQ
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about IBM MQ. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
The initial setup of IBM MQ can be quite complex, often leading to mistakes during configuration. The documentation, while extensive, can be challenging to navigate. The deployment is typically on-premises, and the actual deployment time can vary based on the complexity of the configuration.
View full review »RR
Rajender Reddy
Software Development Manager at Reliance Jio
The initial setup is easy with no huge steps.
There really isn't any deployment. Creating queues does not take much time and we use them with channels and subscription topics to push and pull messages
View full review »SS
Sunil Sahoo
Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
I am MQ version 6, & 7 -certified solutions architect & system administrator. So I find the setup to be very easy. I have been using MQ since very early of my career, and I was also with IBM for quite some time. So for me, it's very straightforward. The installers come with a nice, quick-setup guide, and most of the time, after the training, users can go set up their own MQ.
The amount of time it would take to bring it to production depends on the scope of the services. If I just have to install MQ, it is not more than an hour. But if I have to install MQ for specific servers, I would probably have to take account of the log size, its location, and what the volume is per day or per week, availability aspects, so it would take a bit longer.
Most of the time, when we implement MQ, we implement it along with other products. It depends on the use case. If you just want to query the server to get the information, I would recommend that to be asynchronous because inquiries are huge in volume. If the use case is payments, it could be defined as synchronous mode, and within the flow we could still break it into two or three parts.
From the design point of view, it is still pretty straightforward, depending on what licensing model you want to go for. If you want to use one MQ server with multiple clients it's doable, but if you have more critical systems running, then you should go for multiple MQ servers so that you have a dedicated server for each particular application. Those are the guiding principles that we use internally for projects to follow.
For deployment, we have written our own scripts. We are mostly relying on AIX/ Linux server. Our scripts are pretty much standard to do things like create/ change queue, channels and it's properties, shut down, restart the MQ services. All these are already scripted, so for our support team it takes them a few minutes to run through them, one after the other, and wait for scripts to be executed.
View full review »The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.
MA
Mohammad Al-Smadi
Product Development Manager at Arab Bank
Setting up MQ is easy. We had a "grow as you go" implementation strategy. We started with a single channel and progressed to multiple queues and channels depending on the systems and integrations with other systems. It was a gradual deployment and expansion as we grew the services interacting with the core system using MQ. Maintenance requires two or three admins.
View full review »MT
reviewer1579410
Head Of Operations at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
The installation can be fairly simple, but when changes or modifications are necessary within the system for the implementation it can be a bit difficult. We standardize a lot of the process whether it is using Jenkins or Pipelines, or another solution to make it as simple as possible. However, when we make changes and more errors and configuration problems come up, it can be quite difficult to narrow down those problems. Generally, we automate most of this part which has limited the impact but the process could be improved.
Since we automate a lot of the deployment elements I am not sure the breakdown of how long it takes for each part, but typically all together it takes approximately half a day.
View full review »VM
Vjacheslav Mikitjuk
Director of Internet Technologies Division at IBA Group
The initial setup is easy. If the required access and permissions are provided, the deployment takes one day or less. But in most cases, we wait for some permissions or access to systems to finish the deployment on the customer site. One DevOps employee is enough for the deployment.
I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten.
In terms of the initial setup, we never faced any problems. It's quite easy. Even the cloning and queue managers are really good.
View full review »RJ
Rahul Jayakumar Lekha
Integration Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
From an implementation perspective, it was hard for the features that we were using. However, recently, it has become quite easy to implement.
The setup team is a bigger team due to the size of MQ in the company, which is quite huge. We have around 200 managers and the size of the team is around 20 members and they can all assist with deployment tasks.
View full review »The initial setup is pretty easy. It's not that complex. I'd rate the ease of implementation at a seven or eight out of ten.
The deployment time is pretty short. It's not a long process.
In an integration scenario, like payment processing, where the payment has to go to the backend system, SAP, or talk to multiple applications, due to the fact that it's a lengthy, complex business process, we just decouple it. Some of the information we get immediately after receiving the request, and we pass on the information to the customer. Then, we put the payload into the IBM MQ, and then we started processing from IBM MQ. So there are integrations that sometimes need to be done or worked with.
View full review »JJ
Jitendra Jethwa
Websphere MQ Specialist at a maritime company with 10,001+ employees
The initial setup is not complex. It is a very simple installation. I've been provided with instructions that make the whole solution extremely easy to download and install.
The entire process is very fast. It only takes about 30 minutes to deploy.
We have different departments that can handle deployments. We have about 100 people on our team that can handle this type of assignment.
View full review »MB
Mat Brudar
Senior Developer at a media company with 10,001+ employees
I've been doing it for over 20 years, so it's straightforward to me. Beginners might struggle with the initial settings, like user rights and the basic stuff, but setting up MQ is fine.
View full review »Actually, setup was straightforward. I'm not a hardware person and it was a first-time setup. It was what they said it was. It wasn't a 30-minute setup, but it was pretty easy.
View full review »IF
reviewer1959375
ExaminerExaminer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
The initial setup of IBM MQ can be straightforward if you have the documentation, it is step-by-step and straightforward.
View full review »AA
Amr-Adel
It division head at MOI kuwait
The solution's initial setup is easy.
View full review »LL
Luis Lascano
Solutions Director at Thesys Technologies
The setup for this software was very complex, particularly with the integration between the two systems I was talking about earlier: on the core backend and on the user frontend that is the Wall Street system. It has a lot of different types of flows, and all those flows are defined into the server that is called TTI that is working under the MQ series. That contains a lot of complexities because the vendor of the front-end system has included in the MQ side the server functionality for the application, instead of doing it directly in either the backend or the frontend. This means the MQ part is also helping with the logic for processing messages, and the logic is maintained in a layer: the MQ layer in the server that's called TTI. This is the first time we have faced such complexity, but regarding the MQ as is, meaning the vanilla version, it is quite straightforward. That server works the proper way.
View full review »I was involved in the initial setup, but not in this company; at a different company. I found that it was easy to install.
View full review »I was not really involved in the initial setup. I was probably around for it, but I had an applications background. I went from the systems side to the applications side, and back to the systems side. It was kind of the interim period. I'm not really responsible for the MQ right now. I'm more of a user of MQ and a supporting group. As a mainframe user, we basically have that relationship with them.
View full review »GT
George Thomas
Lead Architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
If it is a standalone implementation, it is straightforward. If the implementation is the higher availability mode, XM mode, it becomes a complicated process because it comes with a shared disk resource where one instance goes down, and another instance comes up. This means it can not always be an Active mode, you require an Active-Passive mode all the time. This can increase the setup cost and complexity.
View full review »It was straightforward. It took less than a minute.
View full review »VP
reviewer1079856
Lead Software Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
The initial setup is straightforward, it's easy.
If someone knows its basic structure, it is easy, but the open-source is much easier than IBM MQ because you just have to install it and start working on it. With IBM MQ you have some installation procedures.
The open-source version needs route access which could be security compliance and could be complex.
View full review »There are a lot of things that MQ can do, so the configuration setup needs some involvement.
View full review »In some places, setup is very easy and in others, it is a little bit complex. When we are trying to deliver all of our transactions from web to system CID, it's a little bit complex because the workload is not the same in both platforms. To make this work is sometimes difficult.
View full review »Setup was straightforward. I had experience from my previous work, so I was able to bring that experience and implement it here. I was fully versed with it, so it was easier for me.
View full review »I was not involved in the initial setup. I was a DB2 engineer, a systems programmer, for many years. Then I moved into management, into the middleware area, which had CICS, MQ, and other products. Then I actually moved up into a director and now, I'm director of mainframe services. I wasn't involved in the actual initial setup.
Some of the things have been around for 20 years or so, but I've been involved in probably five or six upgrades, other deployments and other feature turn-ons that MQs contributed to. I was heavily involved with that, but not as far as bringing it up and installing it from the beginning, no.
It was already there when I came to the company some 13 years ago; already in place. But I've managed it for probably 8-9 years.
View full review »NK
reviewer1688772
Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
From a coding perspective, it's a straightforward process. There are no complications. We cannot directly access the IBM server because there is a separate team assigned to do some security and get some code of conduct from the MQ team. They are handling the MQ server. So we ask them to create these entry servers to discuss that. And also, we are defining everything. We are responsible for handling invalid queries. So they recreate a wrong question or wrong to them. So, whatever is an appropriate question.
In terms of maintenance, there are three reasons you'll get a maintenance window. On the maintenance window, we are just restarting the epicenter. Nothing else. If it requires any patching or updates, we perform those. But you don't have to restart the application. The epicenter typically runs continuously.
SS
reviewer1466346
Senior Technology Lead at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
The installation was straightforward until we started to have resiliency problems, it then became more complex to have to set up clustered MQ servers. We were using Linux Red Hat cluster services, which became an extra burden. When it eventually came time to do other activities, such as updating the operating system or a specific driver, for example, a firmware driver for the bare-metal servers themselves, having the MQ's clusters being sensitive caused a challenge for service and support.
View full review »MA
Mohammad Al-Smadi
Product Development Manager at Arab Bank
The initial setup was average. Not so complex and not so straightforward.
The deployment itself, not including testing, took a couple of hours.
View full review »EC
Eduardo Cano
Architect & System Engineer at Servicio de Impuestos Internos
The initial setup was easy because IBM did the installation and integration of MQ with our appliance.
The deployment took a month.
View full review »The setup was straightforward and we wrapped it in a very complex way.
View full review »The initial setup was straightforward. It was easy to install and configure.
View full review »RS
Rohit K Sharma
Ops Innovation Platform Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
We setup IBM MQ about four or five years back. I think the setup now would be much easier than the one we did then.
View full review »WK
Walter Kuhn
ICT Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We have a standardized way in describing our servers, services and rights because we have our own infrastructure. We just generate the MQSC scripts, then push it to the right server.
View full review »Initial setup was pretty straightforward. The more complicated part of it was the actual IBM CLM tools implemented within IBM MQ. IBM MQ itself was pretty simple.
I've heard that there have been challenges with upgrades, but we haven't gone through an upgrade cycle yet, at least in quite some time. We'll see how well that is but we haven't had that challenge yet.
View full review »I was not involved in the initial setup.
View full review »I was not involved in the initial setup.
View full review »Initial setup was straightforward and flexible.
View full review »NK
reviewer1302078
Technical Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
The setup was very complex in the beginning: how we had to put it in, how we had to tune it, and how we had to fix it. There were so many parameters. It wasn't just a simple drop-in, deploy, and go. In addition, because certain applications work in a certain manner, it required a lot of tuning.
My team, on average, has 10 years of experience on MQ so at this stage we've come to the point where we can tune it fairly quickly. So while the initial setup wasn't simple and quick, it has become very quick.
The initial setup took us several weeks, if not a few months. We had to get IBM to help with things in the beginning. We had system issues then, but it has been stable since then.
View full review »I was involved in the setup. It's straightforward, but I had done this before.
View full review »Because I had worked with it before, initial setup wasn't that bad. If I look at myself at the beginning, when we wanted to set it up, I actually went and took a course before setting it up. Especially on the iSeries side and all the communications, you have to get familiar with all the terms and terminology that are being used on the application. Once you know that, then setting it up is not a big deal.
View full review »PP
Prashant Powar
Senior Middleware Administrator at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
The initial setup is very simple. The installation doesn't take more than 15 or 20 minutes.
View full review »We've set it up in several ways. I had it for a year. Each original implementation was with Accenture and we've had several crews come in to manage the services. There are different SIs that come in like Tech Mahindra and HCL. Over 15 years we've had a lot of independents come in and support.
We're just building on top of the existing platform now. But we've made a strategic decision to move away from this on-premise infrastructure, the data centers if possible.
We've got 4,000 employees, it's quite a sizeable business that we take on vendors to come in. We're not an IT shop. Different managed services from different vendors.
We don't consider users for the platform. It's more about what transactions. So I think it ranges from two and a half million to 10 million messages a day.
View full review »AA
Abraham Ansah-Cudjoe
Unix/Linux Systems Administrator at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
The initial setup is very straightforward. I have done it both on Linux and on Windows. With Windows, it is just a case of hitting the "next" button. I would say that within ten minutes, you should be finished with the installation.
Prior to the installation, you have to make sure that you have Java installed.
View full review »GB
Gurvijay Bhatti
Senior Solutions Architect at Department of Justice
The setup was straightforward for simple usage. Load balancing is more complex.
View full review »I was involved in the initial setup. It was fairly straightforward. Once you start creating the queue managers, there's some configuration involved, which our developers take care of. I just take care of the basic installation of the product, which is very simple.
View full review »I was involved in the initial setup. It was straightforward.
View full review »I was involved in the setup process. We got the basic functionality working, which is not difficult. It's getting the full value out of this solution that was harder.
View full review »I was involved in the initial set up at my organization from an infrastructure standpoint. We provide the infrastructure tier. On the open-system side, we helped with it and helped the implementation out on the mainframe.
The actual installation is straightforward. The configuration and the implementation of enabling MQ to talk and communicate between the systems can be complicated.
View full review »I was involved in all the possibilities. In the past, I have carried out the implementation process from scratch. With my current employer, I have started supporting and building more for the already existing environment.
View full review »Initial setup was complex because of what we were trying to do, as far as the distribution of a number of clones. With the IBM team, there was more internal drama and relationships – more personal problems – than there were technology problems.
View full review »ÖÇ
reviewer1662720
Yapı Kredi şirketinde Application Infrastructure Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
The onboarding processes and setup are very easy.
RV
reviewer1444734
IT Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
The basic setup is simple. The deployment is fully automated.
View full review »I was not involved in the initial setup.
View full review »I was involved in the initial setup. It is straightforward. Since I'm familiar with this tool and been working with it for 12 years, it was straightforward.
View full review »Initial setup was quite straightforward.
View full review »The people on my team were involved in the initial setup, absolutely. There was a little bit of complexity involved with the mainframe section, around some general ways that the thing is implemented in the system, and things that have to happen early on during the IPL and some other processes that we have. That's the part I'm most familiar with. The other platforms it's run on, I'm not sure.
In general, once we got through some of those issues, it was pretty straightforward.
View full review »FT
Fran Tomas
Architect at T-Systems International GmbH
IBM MQ has a complex setup. The time it takes for deployment take approximately two to three months.
View full review »The initial setup was straightforward and took around half an hour.
View full review »NT
reviewer1164303
Service Delivery Consultant at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
IBM MQ is not at all difficult to set up.
There is no deployment, per se. A broker will handle the deployment.
View full review »DB
reviewer1626039
Software Engineering Expert at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
The installation can be easy, but it depends on the environment.
View full review »The initial setup is 50/50, between straightforward and complex. The difficult part is because for the integration of other systems with IBM MQ, they need to use software from the IBM client. But the installation itself is not difficult.
View full review »The initial setup of IBM MQ is complex.
View full review »The installation is not difficult for IBM MQ and takes approximately one day.
View full review »Setup has to be done by the team from IBM. Client just needs to enjoy the excellent support.
View full review »The initial setup was straightforward.
View full review »I was not involved in the initial setup.
View full review »VZ
reviewer914148
Cloud Integration Leader - Cloud Migration Leader at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
It's straightforward to set up IBM MQ because we can use it in lightweight modules, like containers, for example. It's not always easy for applications to connect to IBM MQ, but I think it's fine in general.
View full review »SM
reviewer1127196
Sr. Solution Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
I can't speak to how the initial setup went. Those kinds of tasks are handled by the technology team. Therefore, I can't say if it was an easy or complex process.
I'm not sure, ultimately, how long the deployment process was.
View full review »AS
reviewer1644639
Technical Specialist at a maritime company with 10,001+ employees
The initial setup was straightforward. It's all about planning because we have multiple application teams involved. Deployment takes somewhere between half an hour to an hour, but for the coordination to check and perform from the application side, takes almost a full day because we have critical, multiple applications. It needs to be coordinated and we need to be sure they are able to connect perfectly with our environment or with the MQ.
View full review »SR
Srinivasa Reddy
Assistant Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
The initial setup is straightforward. It takes a few minutes.
View full review »In the latest installation that we are talking about right now, I was not involved. But, for other installations in the past, I was involved in the set up and it was pretty straightforward. I'd consider MQ one of the simplest products to use.
View full review »I was involved with the initial setup. It wasn't quite straightforward because the original versions used CICS and that was a little tricky sometimes. But, then they went and made the agent as part of the package of using the CICS.
View full review »Setup was more complex than what I thought it might be. We have an active-active cluster, meaning that the systems will fail over to each other if they need to. It was more complicated to set up. We had difficulties setting that up initially, even with consultant help.
View full review »Initial setup was straightforward.
View full review »I'm a director and me and my team were involved in the initial set up of MQ. It was very straight forward. We had people that were familiar with it. Some of the people that I worked with, or that worked for me, really had a good background, so it went very quickly, and it was very straight forward.
View full review »VP
Vlad Popa
Integration Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The initial setup was a bit complex. The installation itself can take anywhere from half an hour to four hours, and the configuration could also take a couple of hours, depending on the complexity of the design.
View full review »SR
reviewer895323
Enterprise Architect at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees
The initial setup is usually left to other people to do. I've never actually done the installation and setup of it myself. It has been other people with a bit more deep technical knowledge who have done the implementation and actual installations. It was a very long time ago when I received the first set of CDs where we were going to be doing the installation of it, but I don't have that deep technical knowledge of the implementation as such.
View full review »VB
reviewer1370595
IT Development Manager at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
While I was part of the process for implementing RabbitMQ, which was very simple and straightforward, in the case of IBM, I didn't install it myself. Unfortunately, I cannot explain how easy or difficult it was as I was not part of the experience. My understanding is it's not too difficult.
In terms of maintenance, we have two people from the support team handling that aspect. They can restart the server or look into the queues. They aren't working in shifts, however, if there are issues, one of them is normally available to troubleshooting.
In comparison, for RabbitMQ, we had only one developer that installed it and created the publishers, workers etc. I believe the support will be the same as for IBM. In both cases, there aren't too many people needed for maintenance.
UR
Upendra Rao
Independent Consultant at State Bank of India
The initial setup for the messaging part is straightforward. For other features, it's of medium complexity.
View full review »Setup was complex. It requires a lot of components to be configured.
View full review »I was involved in the setup of the distributive systems. It was straightforward.
View full review »Setup was pretty straightforward. MQ has been around for a long time. It's a reliable product. It doesn't change that much, so I think everybody, at least in my organization, is fairly comfortable with installing and implementing MQ.
View full review »SK
reviewer1319055
Sap Financial Accounting Senior Consultant at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
It is pretty easy to set up. The installation takes less than five minutes for each server. People can learn IBM MQ in one week.
Even a version upgrade can be done easily. Including doing backups and installation, it can be completed in 10 to 15 minutes. Even RabbitMQ and Kafka require more steps for setup than IBM MQ. Installation of the IBM product is very simple.
I was not involved in the initial setup.
View full review »I was in the initial setup; I was involved in the design of the environment for MQ and the rollout of that platform.
It was midway between straightforward and being complex. Our environment is quite complex. We have to integrate the different systems; we have MQ on z/OS, we have MQ distributed. It's right across the platform. The setup of MQ was not complex, but the integration with our environment had some complexity. Overall, with the MQ platform, I don’t think we could have done it any easier.
View full review »GT
George Thomas
Lead Architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
MQ is has a straightforward implementation. There is not much configuration required. It is more complicated for a cluster implementation and the active-passive implementation. You'll need more technical knowledge
A regular deployment will take around five to 10 minutes. If it's for a cluster implementation, it will take at least 15 to 30 minutes.
We have an internal team that does the implementation. We asked IBM to do the deployment.
View full review »SN
Sanjeev Nirala
Senior Technical Architect at Nagarro
The setup and configurations are very easy, not complex. I would give the product plus points for this. This is compared to readily available, open source products that make you scratch your head when you go to set them up because they don't have documentation.
It takes a couple days to deploy the product to production.
View full review »The setup was straightforward. Network connectivity is easy as long as you understand your solution design requirements.
I had to take over the project with limited knowledge about the product. I can safely say today that I support the solution with minimum assistance from the software vendor. I was not trained, nor did I have skills transferred to me to enable me to support the product
View full review »DG
reviewer1310736
Manager Specialist Platform (Java) at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees
The setup is between straightforward and complex. It's not as straightforward as Apache ActiveMQ.
View full review »I was not involved in the initial setup.
View full review »ME
solution259344
Enterprise Solutions Architect at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
If you are familiar with IBM products, you will find initial setup straightforward.
View full review »The setup is straightforward. There is not much to create, it's a one-time setup, including configuring the high-availability. That is the main thing. The parameters create the queues. It takes about 10 to 15 seconds for each queue.
In addition, we had IIB, the IBM Integration Bus deployment, including message flows and DB scripts, etc. So the deployment was not only MQ. In deploying IIB flows, we had some queue creation, server connections, and channel creation. Overall, it was about 80 percent IIB deployment and 20 percent MQ deployment.
We had two people involved: one guy from the support team and one guy from admin. For maintenance, in the sense of the application support, we have four team members but we are handling multiple applications, not only MQ.
View full review »I was not involved with the initial setup.
View full review »The setup was complicated because when I started and there were around 400 queue managers. We have four companies that we communicate with, so we changed a lot of the architecture, i.e., we went from the local queue managers to centralize and to reduce issues, in order to have a more manageable system.
View full review »I was not involved in the initial setup with this current version.
View full review »Sometimes I am involved in the setup. But, now my people have become experts setting it up. There are issues that happen once in a while. For example, last year it happened when we changed the server. For whatever reasons, the configurations were in fact reset. So we brought IBM in. Those were complex configurations. For whatever reason, a couple of parameters could not be reset. Or, they didn't remember which parameters to reset.
View full review »The initial install was a long time ago.
View full review »KG
reviewer1037130
Lead Talent Acquisition Specialist at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
This initial setup is not complex at all. Deploying it was very easy.
View full review »MR
Mohamed Ramses
IT Consultant at Ministry of Justice, Kuwait
The initial setup is straightforward. On the AS/400, setup takes about an hour.
View full review »AS
reviewer1319070
IT Team Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
The initial setup is difficult. Creating your own cluster is difficult and working with cluster repositories is difficult. Issue management with IBM MQ is difficult.
View full review »KP
reviewer1317309
Consultant at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
I'm working on the development side. There is a setup team that is dedicated to working on implementations. I don't have enough hands-on in the configuration of MQ to comment on the setup.
View full review »The setup is moderate; it's not that complex. Recently, we are working for one of the Microsoft technologies transformation, i.e., from the legacy Microsoft technologies to the latest Microsoft technologies and that integrates with some of the z Systems.They are using MQ as the integration layer and even there, it was a very seamless integration for us. It's not too complicated nor very simple either. It is at the moderate level, which for integration is anticipated.
View full review »I would say it was both straightforward and complex, but not that complex. I mean the installation normally would take some time and with all of them open, it's just a button click and you're done.
View full review »I was not involved in the initial setup.
View full review »I was not involved with the initial setup. We usually get in touch with them in order to solve the issues.
View full review »DS
Dameer Siddiqui
Works at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
While the initial setup is not overly difficult, the user interface is not very user-friendly.
CM
Reviewer397
Principal Solution Specialist at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I do not get involved with the setup of the solutions. But, my team member was very happy with it, and said it was quite easy to install.
View full review »SB
reviewer1753083
Sr. Middleware/Data Specialist at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
The initial setup is very easy. Deployment took a few hours and required a three-person team to implement.
View full review »IS
reviewer1181517
Project Manager/System Architect/Senior Mainframe System Engineer/Integration Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The initial setup is straightforward, but you need to take the platform into consideration. If you are talking about Linux, AIX, and Windows, then the setup is really straightforward. However, z/OS or iSeries from IBM are not so straightforward so you need to be familiar with those platforms.
It takes half a day to fully configure MQ on Windows and Linux, and a bit longer on AIX. For z/OS and iSeries, it takes about five days to fully configure their environments.
View full review »SP
reviewer1046859
Administrator at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
The initial setup is not complex. It's very simple. I didn't find any difficulty with it.
View full review »I was not involved in the initial setup.
View full review »NT
reviewer1164303
Service Delivery Consultant at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
The initial setup is straightforward. It's not very complex.
View full review »RH
reviewer1289778
freelance at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The installation is easy but the configuration could be complicated because you have to specify a lot of stuff, like queues. It could be a little bit complicated to configure if you have some specific scenarios. For a simple scenario it's easy, but when you have somewhat more complicated scenarios — for example, when you have a hybrid or you need to support some specific security requirements which you use to implement custom components — then it's not easy.
The time it takes to deploy depends on what type of clusters you need. For deployment for testing purposes, where you do not need any cluster, it can really be done in one day, maximum. It's not that difficult. But if you need to deploy a cluster, like a Veritas Cluster, and to prepare the workload balance, it can take days, with system testing etc. You have to combine a lot of other components.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
IBM MQ
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about IBM MQ. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.