NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays Pros and Cons

NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays Pros

Alberto Alberti
Senior System Engineer at ICTeam
The NetApp EF-Series gave our organization easy access to our data bases.
View full review »
CTO5678
CTO
The main advantage of this solution is performance.
View full review »
Paulo-RODRIGUES
Senior Systems Engineer at Indra
Rapid deployment, easy integration management and cloning of areas.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Dell EMC, Pure Storage and others in All-Flash Storage Arrays. Updated: April 2020.
407,845 professionals have used our research since 2012.
ITsotrage677
IT Storage Specialist - Solutions Architect at Sorint.Lab
The replication and mirroring features are very good.
View full review »
MohamedYassin
IT Systems Engineer at Adaptive Solutions
The most valuable feature is the ability to set a specific margin of performance to a specific workload.
View full review »
reviewer805377
Associate Executive - Technical Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The management software is very good.
View full review »
Infotechengine67
IT Engineer at agiba
This storage solution is both stable and scalable, and it works for our needs.
View full review »
Omar Capaetti
Assistant Engineer at a tech company with 51-200 employees
The solution allows us to segregate one storage unit from another.
View full review »
MaximChepukov
Engineer at ALC Vitalyur
The most valuable feature of this solution is its speed.
View full review »
Максим Чепуков
Engineer at ALC Vitalyur
The stability, speed, and reliability are the solution's best features. The information is also very secure.
View full review »

NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays Cons

Alberto Alberti
Senior System Engineer at ICTeam
This solution has limited storage.
View full review »
CTO5678
CTO
This solution does not have any compression or deduplication.
View full review »
Paulo-RODRIGUES
Senior Systems Engineer at Indra
Their problems are on the software and the controlling of the storage where they lack segmentation and federation.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Dell EMC, Pure Storage and others in All-Flash Storage Arrays. Updated: April 2020.
407,845 professionals have used our research since 2012.
ITsotrage677
IT Storage Specialist - Solutions Architect at Sorint.Lab
It was difficult to implement and lacks some additional features that would be useful, but as a solution fits a particular need for our organization.
View full review »
MohamedYassin
IT Systems Engineer at Adaptive Solutions
I would like to have the ability to replicate data between All Flash and other NetApp storage systems.
View full review »
reviewer805377
Associate Executive - Technical Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The price of the All Flash solution is very high.
View full review »
Infotechengine67
IT Engineer at agiba
We need a center related to NetApp in Egypt so that we can deal with them directly.
View full review »
Omar Capaetti
Assistant Engineer at a tech company with 51-200 employees
There could be better integration with some of our Cisco products.
View full review »
MaximChepukov
Engineer at ALC Vitalyur
The pricing could be cheaper and it should have documentation in more languages, specifically, Russian.
View full review »
Максим Чепуков
Engineer at ALC Vitalyur
NetApp could improve the speed of the rebuilding rate.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Dell EMC, Pure Storage and others in All-Flash Storage Arrays. Updated: April 2020.
407,845 professionals have used our research since 2012.