VMware vRealize Operations (vROps) Other Solutions Considered

SolArch2087
Solutions Architect at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
We looked at a couple of other products. We looked at Turbonomic and Veeam. But we have a very large relationship with VMware, so we have a hefty discount. We are also very involved with using Log Insight and with using vRA. So we buy the suite and vROps is free. It would cost us more to buy those other tools individually. Since we have the suite, we have the licenses so it makes sense to use it. That being said, we did buy Turbonomic about a month ago because operations management says vROps is not working for us for the real-time monitoring and automatically adjusting to the environment. vROps is working for historical work, so are still planning on using it for that. Turbonomic does not have historical, so they work together in a way. But We've had to buy, for a few more million dollars, another product whose function, we thought, vROps was going to do all of. View full review »
SeniorSy12df
Senior Systems Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
There are other providers out there that will give a similar experience to vROps, but we're comfortable with it. We were being pressured to look at these other things because one of our acquisitions used one of them. They wanted us to come to an agreement on what was best and we didn't like what they were using, so we stuck with vROps. Now they're with vROps, and lucky for them. View full review »
Chuck Jones
Systems Architect at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
We have looked at other solutions. We purchased Veeam not too long ago. Veeam has a product called Veeam ONE that does somewhat the same thing, but the way vRealize Operations integrates with the functionality of other things - like Insight Manager, and vRealize Automation - makes it the thing that brings all the pieces of the puzzle together. Using a third-party product we would be missing that. And it does it better than other pieces, so for us, it was a no-brainer. It would help us out with our vision of using VMware plus it worked better than the other products we looked at and PoC'ed. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Turbonomic vs. VMware vRealize Operations (vROps) and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
353,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.
ChristianSmith
Principal Server Specialist at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We looked at Turbonomic. It was expensive because of their ability to learn your environment. We already owned a piece of the vROPs suite, the compliance manager, so we sort of fell into the suite. We thought we can go out and buy Turbonomic, which will cost us so much money or we get the enterprise product because we already have the compliance manager piece, which is what we did, and never looked back. It's an excellent solution compared to others. When I first looked at a Turbonomic was a few years ago, they had a few more features than what vCOPS was doing at the time. I gave that feedback and all those features are now in the product. Therefore, there's not much of a comparison today. View full review »
SeniorTefd9a
Senior Technical Architect at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees
We have another solution from Dell EMC called Foglight, and it's way worse. vRealize is ten times better than that product. Although they both leave us with too much nonsense to bother with. View full review »
Infrastr7f30
Infrastructure Manager at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
For this environment we're fairly small, so we didn't really look at anything else. In other environments, we compared other products and other companies against vROps. But, for this environment, it's so small, it just made sense. It's easy enough to do, so we just went with vROps. View full review »
NetworkSb742
Network Server Analyst Senior
At the time, the other one was Turbonomic, but they are a little higher-end. We had to "sell" it to the business. vROps is not cheap either. We convinced the organization that it is in their best interest. And they followed suit. View full review »
ManagerSc159
Manager System Integration
Not at the time of the purchase. Other vendors came once our product became GA. We did not look at any of them, since we had already purchased. We spoke to quite a few other vendors that actually had other products with similar functions of dashboard very similar, or dashboards that were suppose to be better, and they gave you much more analytics of the data. But again we stuck with this product, and the reason why we stuck with it, it gave us what we were looking for. There are some other products that are more proactive, but we decided not to take that approach. View full review »
Kieron Ifill
Principle System Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
We looked at a couple of VMware's competitors. One of them was VMTurbo (now called Turbonomic). The main reason we went with vROps was the ease of integration, ease of use, and the support behind it. The community behind vRealize is relatively large and that just made the decision that much simpler for us. Also, from a cost standpoint, we were able to negotiate with VMware. And, with VMware, the deployment process was a lot simpler for us, and the training-learning curve for vRealize versus the other solution tended to be the easier, so that was also a factor. View full review »
Steve Lain
Systems Architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
For me, there wasn't a competitor because, under the hood, vROps is going to know everything that VirtualCenter does. If you're relying on a third-party to discover all that and put it in place - when I can stay native, I'm going to stay native, when it's the best solution. View full review »
Sean Peleras
Manager for Desktop Services at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees
No. We invested in the overall package and we got vROps as part of it. Look for the partnership when choosing a vendor. We're in a pretty tough environment, healthcare, so we have some unique challenges. If things don't happen right, patient care is affected. So they have to be able to partner with us and understand the urgency behind some of the things we're trying to do. As long as they're flexible and can understand where we're coming from, that's fine. We've had some vendors that just don't get it. VMware has been excellent. View full review »
Al Granell
Member Of The Cloud Team at a logistics company with 10,001+ employees
There's a couple big players in this address space obviously. One of the major considerations for us was our aggressive timeline which we were looking to deploy, and that our deployment head already reached, not just a New Jersey-Atlanta implementation, but throughout the world as well. So the flexibility to expand across the globe is really an important piece of it. View full review »
Michael Gonzalez
NSX Engineer at Intelligent Decisions
I'm not sure which ones they looked at because that was before my time, but they did look at a lot of vendors. I believe one of them was WhatsUp Gold, but that was more of just a product the system pinged. It went down because you can no longer ping it, so that wasn't really good for us. View full review »
ITSystem2387
IT System Architect with 1,001-5,000 employees
Microsoft, and that's really about it. View full review »
Anthony Weaver
Systems Administrator at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
We decided to use it because we're licensed for it. There wasn't a larger discussion around it. View full review »
Chris Beardsley
Database Systems Admin at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Epic actually has its own product to monitor itself. It wasn't until vROps revealed that it had this, and we could see how it operated, that it came to the forefront. So we really didn't focus in on anything else. View full review »
William Earles
Director Of Infrastructure Services at Yavapai College
We used ManageEngine, but that was more looking at the Windows side of things. I can't remember any of the others we looked at. View full review »
Ben Moore
Lead Systems Engineer at a insurance company with 201-500 employees
Another vendor on our shortlist was WhatsUp Gold. View full review »
SystemEn3d6f
System Engineer with 1,001-5,000 employees
We looked at ManageEngine and SolarWinds. We chose vROps because we're a large company and they gave us a good price cut. Also because the feature set looked good from the demos. View full review »
Infrastraf24
Infrastructure Engineer with 1,001-5,000 employees
We had a little bit of Hyper-V, but normally, mostly VMware. View full review »
Mike Schreiber
Virtualization Engineer at Moraine park technical college
vROps was there before me. When I got there, I was asked if I felt that there was value in keeping it and I said yes, absolutely. View full review »
SeniorDi8000
Senior Director
A lot of open-source stuff. What vROps does today, I've done it with open source products. In fact, I logged stashed stuff like that. I've done all those functions there and I've written scripts in a box that push and pull from places where I need it. I know there are other competitors out there, but I've just never been able to see those guys. View full review »
Micah Plourd
Senior Tech Engineer at McKinsey & Company
We also looked at VMTurbo and there were a few other ones for resource reclamation but as soon as we found out that vROps in the newer versions was able to be a little bit more robust, it was the clear selling point. View full review »
Speciali9a58
Specialist Virtualization at a hospitality company with 10,001+ employees
When I actually did the evaluation there was no shortlist. We had a couple products that were in place and I pushed forward with getting an enterprise solution that captured all the data. We already had this solution halfway in the environment from some other purchases on the Standard edition, so we just built off of that. We had VMTurbo, and SolarWinds is still in the environment. Cost-wise vROps is probably a little more expensive than the other two products put together, for the advanced piece that we need, where we can do customized dashboards. But the feature set is way more advanced. I think with VMTurbo we were only getting 25 to 30 data points and now we're getting hundreds of data points in the environment. View full review »
Saurabh Chandratre
Director Solutions Architect - EMEA at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
There were a couple of options that we considered, like Microsoft SCOM and SolarWinds, but the level of monitoring and dashboard visibility wasn’t there. View full review »
SeniorSy16fe
Senior Systems Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
We've looked at other solutions but we stick with the vRealize Operations mainly for the usability and the integration with VMware. View full review »
Daniel-Diaz
Cloud Lead at Molina Healthcare, Inc.
vROps was definitely on the top list, then we had VMTurbo (Turbonomic) and there's another product called Runecast. We have higher-tier products like Scalar but it's not really an operation type. View full review »
Mike Morris
Product Strategy Architect at Expedient
Probably the big one that a lot of people would compare to vROps is Veeam ONE. We looked at Veeam ONE among other products and found that the level of metrics that we got out of vRealize Operations, because it comes from VMware, were pretty much second to none. View full review »
Virtualia9f6
Virtualization Engineer at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I don't know that we really considered anything else in that pure category because, at that time, nothing really compared to it. Everybody had their own little management and monitoring solutions for their little bubbles. But there wasn't this all-inclusive, try to get other vendors to buy in and have one single monitoring solution. View full review »
William Babineaux
Senior System Engineer at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
Not at this time, because we're partnered with them. View full review »
Artez Hendricks
Network Systems Engineer at Bcbsla
Other than VMware, I can't think of any others right now. View full review »
Mark Stringer
IT Consultant at Sureskills
They compare reasonably well to alternative solutions. There are several products that are out there that would manage a virtual infrastructure for customers, but we perceive it to be the best of the existing range of products in that area. View full review »
Blogger51e7
Blogger at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees
We have looked at several different things. We looked at VMTurbo - Turbonomic is what they're called now. We did SolarWinds. We looked at Virtualization Manager because we already have an ELA, so we were just able to add it on to our ELA. But I like keeping everything in the VMware ecosystem. I'm very happy with our choice. View full review »
SeniorVi7d8e
Senior Virtual Desktop Engineer at Madison Technical College
We compared a couple of different tools and it really came down to the fact that VMware was giving us a good price for bundling it with our Horizon purchase, at the time. And, at the time, we were doing PCoIP and it was basically the only product that really gave us that insight. View full review »
ChrisClark
Senior Server Analyst at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees
Veeam. It didn't really fit it very well. View full review »
Andy Weissenborn
CTO at NHS Connecting for Health
We didn't look into other options. We very much get to where VMware house is part of our strategy, it was just a natural fit into our infrastructure. View full review »
SystemsAcc81
Systems Architect at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
We do have a competing solution in now. We have Turbonomic. We're looking at it at the same time. View full review »
Chris Ray
Supervisor of Network Engineering at a hospitality company with 501-1,000 employees
We looked at Cisco CloudCenter. We looked at it at the same time but we knew that 95 percent of our infrastructure runs VMware today, so we wanted to go with the same kind of ecosystem. View full review »
Sumair Qureshi
IT Manager at Robert bosch
We looked at other solutions namely Microsoft, IBM and then, VMware. The reason why we ended up choosing this solution as it offered us a better overall solution to what we were looking for. View full review »
Infrastrbb5a
Infrastructure Engineer at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees
vROps is packaged with our licensing. So that made it a pretty short list. We already had it. We went with it because it's included. We didn't really do a competitive analysis. Just the fact that it's a VMware product, and that means that product updates are going to coincide with other products. You're not going to fall behind when VMware updates a new hypervisor. Just the fact that it's in cadence with their other releases, that's a big selling point for it. View full review »
SeniorSy8d76
Senior Systems Engineer at a media company with 10,001+ employees
Turbonomic, VMTurbo, and Splunk. But I don't think Splunk does the same thing, so, the first two. We chose VMware because they gave us the best price and because of the enterprise association we already have with them. View full review »
it_user599484
Chief Architect For Virtualization at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
We looked at vFoglight again, but it was too difficult. We looked at a product called VMTurbo (Turbonomic), and it didn't really come up to par during the PoC that we went through. We weren't very happy with it. View full review »
Technolo4c43
Technology Manager at a energy/utilities company with 201-500 employees
Peer. We don't have them yet. We're doing a PoC with them, but the people that I've dealt with, their customer service is great. View full review »
SeniorAnb1c9
Senior Analyst at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
On our shorlist, beside vROps, were vFoglight and one other that I don't remember. View full review »
Richard Hambrick
Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We didn't really look at anyone else. We decided on it just because vROps really ties into vCenter. There really wasn't any additional consideration for anybody else. The foundation of our virtual infrastructure is VMware. View full review »
LeadATec1296
Lead Technical Architect with 1,001-5,000 employees
We've looked at other solutions before, but we've never found one that does what VROps does. We've looked at Veeam ONE and VMTurbo, but I don't think they're around anymore. That's part of the problem: There were vendors that did the monitoring and they've all crashed and burned. VROps wouldn't do that. View full review »
RahulSingh
Senior Engineer at Cvent
CDW. We chose VMware because they are the technology leader in virtualization. We have been using it for years now. View full review »
ITManage50ba
IT Manager at a Consumer Goods with 201-500 employees
Most of my infrastructure is Windows, but Hyper-V isn't in the same class as VMware. It still feels like the new kid on the block. I've literally been using VMware since '99, product one. And being here, 20 years later, it's just VMware, it's there, it's what you use. View full review »
Technicaafc9
Technical Expert at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
From a hardware point of view, we looked at SolarWinds. They have a good offering, but the integration is lacking from our point of view. We needed something that would just work without having to put time and effort into it. I personally have used some of the other solutions in this space. I've found that you tend to have to put more manpower into getting them up and running. This is what drew us to vROps. View full review »
reviewer608544
Senior Infrastructure Engineer at United Financial Services
I've been a user of this solution for quite a few years so it's something I've believed in for a while. I've looked at some alternatives but nothing that's given me everything that I needed, that I get out of the vROps. View full review »
Maurizio Rosa
Cloud Specialist
Opsview was another vendor we looked at. We didn't go with it because we liked vROps' use case. It allows us to see simply and graphically what a problem is and we can export a report of the problem for our customer, which is very valuable to us. Opsview gave us some information but we found it to be slower. With vROps, we can monitor every feature and vendor; we can monitor the environment which means we can monitor everything. View full review »
Talha Ghafoor
Principal Architect at BTC Networks
I haven't used a competitor's product. Only VMware was on our list because we were already using all the other VMware solutions, like vSphere, NSX, and vCenter. Therefore, we wanted something to run on top of those products, preferably from VMware, so it could integrate in a better way. View full review »
ITOperat2c16
IT Operations Senior Analyst at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
We also use SolarWinds, AppDynamics, Nimsoft, plus vRealize as well. We're trying to make the company all go for one thing, but it's been a bit of a struggle. We'll be pushing it. View full review »
Ade OYENUSI
Virtualization Consultant at Vantage ad technologies Ltd
In terms of integration, between this product and everything else in the VM product line, it is very easy to just pick this up as opposed to looking elsewhere. View full review »
PrashantSoni
Manager it at Tech elecon
Dell, EMC, and one other. Among the most important criteria in choosing a vendor are their technology roadmap as well as the productivity. View full review »
Bryan OConnor
Principal Technologist at QA Ltd
We use SCOM as well. What we like about the vRealize Suite of products is the customability of the product. We can do things ourselves rather than having to rely solely on Management Packs. View full review »
Jason Mcminn
Senior systems architect at Byte ideas and solutions
Reputation, support, and overall visibility are important criteria for us while selecting a vendor. We looked at other solutions namely VMware, Veeam and Tintri. The reason as to why I chose VMware is because I've used every other major virtualization platform and their support as well as community is by far the best. View full review »
SeniorSy29b0
Senior Systems Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
We use a multiple-monitoring solution but vROps is more tailored towards the environment that we use. We use both solutions hand in hand. The monitoring solutions that we currently use notify us of any issues and whatnot. We use vROps to tell us what the VMs or servers are doing over time. View full review »
Chris Perrin
Infrastructure Architect at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
We looked into a competitor but it was way too expensive. The fact that vRO came as part and parcel of the vRA enterprise gave us a huge win on the cost. View full review »
ITArchit8347
IT Architect at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
We evaluated several other vendors. However, at the price VMware offered us, there was no reason to chose anyone else. View full review »
Chuck Markakis
IT Assistant Director at Maryland transportation authority
We didn't really look at others. We just went with this because it made sense. View full review »
it_user385554
Systems Engineer at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
VMware and VMturbo. We were already heavily into VMware. We looked at other operations and the projection planning and we went with VMware. The projection planning and budgeting wallets are a major piece and there are only once a year. The VM Operations Manager gave us more the rest of the year than the other solution did. View full review »
Stephen Jesse
Systems Engineer at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We looked at Foglight, vRealize, and Veeam. The main reason we chose vRealize is because it's included in our license. View full review »
Henadz Shuliak
Group Manager at Wargaming
We tried to use Veeam ONE one for monitoring but it's a bit difficult. It's a different project and has different ways to manage it. Previous versions of vRealize did not have the same features as Veeam ONE. Now, it does have the same features and much more. View full review »
Doug White
Systems Engineer at 14 West
We tried Veeam ONE and one other whose name I can't recall. View full review »
Infrastra5c8
Infrastructure Manager at a non-tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We did consider some other vendors, but due to the pricing and features of those products, we skipped them quite quickly. View full review »
it_user601317
Sr. Systems Engineer at Imperial PFS
ManageEngine, and we used Veeam and Veeam ONE. Those were basically the only ones. View full review »
Chris Ebright
Data Center Systems Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
For us, they have to be on our approved list to begin with. There are a lot of legal ramifications for us. They always do a comparison of different tools, whether it's DMC or if it's for different solutions. We have two or three different vendors we can go to. Personally, I'd prefer to stay with the VMware stuff. View full review »
Matt Yoschak
Leads Systems Engineer at University of pittsburgh
It was pretty much Microsoft or VMware, from our concerns. So, we started with one and went the other way. View full review »
Kevin Kariuki
Product Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
I've tried other solutions in the industry, and vROps is a good product in comparison. View full review »
Bruno Forghieri Agueda
Analyst with 10,001+ employees
We didn't consider anything else because we have a big contract and a license for pretty much everything VMware offers, so it was just a matter of using the tools we bought. View full review »
Fabio Barcelos
Technologist at Thales Alenia Space
We chose VMware and its solution because it was the most easily supportable. We know some of their consultants and our people know the products. View full review »
Director66f6
Director of Cloud Operations at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
Nobody else. Just VM. View full review »
Tobias Buchter
Engineer at Coop
We used Grafana to monitor our environment. With vROps, you have all the VMware specific metrics and dashboards. It's much harder to invest time in another solution where you have to build it on your own. We just considered vROps. Grafana was something that we designed on our own afterwards. View full review »
David Liscio
Technical Support Analyst at Tangerine
I don't know if we really considered anything else. I think the first choice was vROps. View full review »
Erik Strandberg
Senior IT Engineer at Octapharma
We have another monitoring tool which we use for physical servers and virtual as well, but vRealize Operations Manager gives us more detail. It's best of breed when it come to monitoring. View full review »
George Dimov
Platform Engineering Manager at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
We've explored a number of products. We've used SolarWinds and their VMWare add-ons. But to be able to actually see what our infrastructure does, vRealize Operations Manager has been the closest match as part of our Enterprise agreement. We are licensed for the Blue Medora Advanced Suite which is like an add-on to vRealize Operations Manager. That gives us the visibility into our Cisco and HPE equipment. It's a natural choice. View full review »
SystemsEbcd0
Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
When selecting a vendor reliability and ease of setup is something that is very important to us and are the reasons why we proceeded with this solution. View full review »
SystemsA9de7
Systems Administrator at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
I don't really know of any alternative solutions. View full review »
it_user495177
Senior Virtualization Architect at klx
We went straight from SolarWinds to VMware. We chose VMware because of its time on the market, the company's reputation, and the support. I mostly use VMware products. They integrate well together. I also participate on VMTN, the VMware community online. View full review »
SeniorAn4141
Senior Analyst at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Turbonomic. We chose VMware because we have all the other VMware products. View full review »
Ben Brouhard
Virtualization Systems Engineer with 201-500 employees
We have another competing product that we use to do the same thing. We use it as well. So, we have two things doing the same thing. Some things we like about it, and some things we don't. We're also using SCOM with Veeam together. I don't think we will move away from Veeam and it will not replace SCOM. View full review »
NsxEngin18c1
NSX Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We are currently measuring this solution against other products. We have several different monitoring tools in the environment. We are trying to whittle it down. View full review »
BrianLudwig
Leads System Administrator
There weren't any. There's nobody else that can do what it does. View full review »
Mugunthan Soundararajan
Vp Technology at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
No, not at all. View full review »
VMwareAd699d
VMware Administrator at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
SeniorDi2db2
Senior Director of Technology Infrastructure at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
IBM, PureSoftware, and Dell EMC. View full review »
SystemsE89e6
Systems Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
We didn't really evaluate anyone else. View full review »
Mathias Meyenburg
Managing Director at Vleet GmbH
Other competitive tools are not as good. The whole stack with VMware is a complete solution to use. View full review »
Consulta3885
Consultant
Nutanix, Rubrik, Cohesity. View full review »
Charles Calabrese
Manager Server and Storage Operations
SystemAd6c89
System Administrator with 1,001-5,000 employees
Technica59d4
Technical Analyst at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
We were always looking to be better at what we do, so it was this or outside third-party products. We had a decent rapport with VMware already, and didn't feel like we needed to look outside to other solutions. It's an extension of our vSphere environment. View full review »
Solutionc8c3
Solution Engineer with 5,001-10,000 employees
I have evaluated SolarWind and Microsoft SCOM. vROps's key value is its ability to have a hypervisor metrics of monitoring, which other products do not have. View full review »
Aashish
Principal Technical Consultant at Fujitsu Consulting India
I checked the integration capability with tools like JIRA and ServiceNow. View full review »
SeniorTee08d
Senior Technical Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Not really. We've wanted this for a couple of years and we just didn't have the budget for it. View full review »
ServerSuf8a6
Server Support at a Consumer Goods with 10,001+ employees
SeniorSy5380
Senior System Analyst
Solutionf19a
Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Hyper-V and Acropolis. We went with VMware's vROps because the customer selected it. View full review »
Tommy Knight
Virtualization Engineer at Probity
SystemsEa116
Systems Engineer at a university with 10,001+ employees
It's better than the moderating features built-in for vSphere. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Turbonomic vs. VMware vRealize Operations (vROps) and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
353,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sign Up with Email