Mule ESB Review

Powerful data transformation technology, but it needs to be more user-friendly

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use for this solution is API driven related management and lightweight message processing.

What is most valuable?

The most powerful feature is DataWeave, which is a powerful language where data can be transformed from one form into another. 

What needs improvement?

This solution could be improved by making it more flexible, and more user-friendly.

I would like to see support for BPM in the next release of this solution.

For how long have I used the solution?

One year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This solution is very good, and it is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

In terms of scalability, it is very good.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support for this solution is very good, and very interactive. If I have any questions then I reach out to them and they respond very quickly.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We were using a variety of technologies, but we use this solution because it is a very lightweight message processing system.

How was the initial setup?

I would say that this initial setup was moderate.

What about the implementation team?

Our DevOps handled the implementation.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We looked at other options, but this one is what our vendor recommended.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Mule ESB reviews from users
...who compared it with IBM Integration Bus
Learn what your peers think about Mule ESB. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2021.
501,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment