Palo Alto Networks WildFire Review

Excellent for remote access and very stable


What is our primary use case?

We use it for remote access and security.

What is most valuable?

Remote access is excellent.

What needs improvement?

Management and web filtering can be improved. There should also be better reporting, particularly around web filtering.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've had it for years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is very stable.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We were using another solution. We switched for more features.

How was the initial setup?

Its initial setup is complex. It is specialized. It is not off-the-shelf stuff. 

What about the implementation team?

We used a reseller. It took six months. You need two to three people for its deployment and maintenance.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It depends on the features. Additional features cost additional money as well.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate this solution an eight out of 10.

Which version of this solution are you currently using?

9
**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Palo Alto Networks WildFire reviews from users
...who work at a Government
...who compared it with Check Point SandBlast Network
Learn what your peers think about Palo Alto Networks WildFire. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2021.
534,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user
Guest