Ranorex Studio Review

It provides us a better user-friendly UI, a less expensive tool, and continuous integration capabilities. However, it needs support for OSs other than Windows.

Valuable Features:

A non-technical person can record a test and execute the same. But, a technical person is required to write code module and test data.

Improvements to My Organization:

As per my knowledge, we don't have a (Free) robust tool for functional and GUI testing in desktop application testing field. This is way better than QTP and Silktest when compared to in following aspects:

User friendly UI

Cost of Tool

Continuous Integration

Instant release of updated add-on as per latest technologies and browsers.

Full fledged trial product for exact 30 days.

Room for Improvement:

Need support for other operating systems like Mac and Linux, and not just Windows.

Which version of this solution are you currently using?

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Ranorex Studio reviews from users
...who work at a Computer Software Company
...who compared it with Telerik Test Studio
Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex, SmartBear, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: June 2021.
510,882 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user