Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Competitors and Alternatives
Get our free report covering Micro Focus, Micro Focus, Apache, and other competitors of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise. Updated: January 2021.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Read reviews of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise competitors and alternatives
reviewer1329360
Performance Architect at Kohl's
Has monitoring capabilities integrated into it to see the performance of components while the test is in the running phase
What is our primary use case?
I have used NetStorm primarily for load generation to do load and stress tests on the desktop and mobile platforms of Kohls.com. I was able to generate high load with NetStorm which helped identify the performance bottlenecks of the applications in the project phase itself. NetStorm script can be generated on any environment and can be replayed to run load test on different environments. It has great features like Runlogic, autocorrelation, and monitoring capability associated inside it.Pros and Cons
- "NetStorm can generate high load with a single machine. Its Runlogic feature is very useful to send load to cover each and every flow of the application. NetStorm gives the feasibility of generating load with multiple load arrival models helping components to be tested based on its usage."
- "The user interface had to be improved for the product. Its user interface should be made simple and easy to customize as per user needs."
What other advice do I have?
It's a great load generating tool with integrated monitoring capability. The company has a highly talented client support to provide their services round the clock.reviewer1381095
Quality Assurance Test Manager at a printing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Cost-effective and straightforward to deploy, but the reporting needs to be improved
What is our primary use case?
When I was last using JMeter, we were simulating 200 concurrent users and evaluating performance based on transaction times. We were defining SLAs based on the results. Essentially, we created load scenarios and testing different ones using different workload models.Pros and Cons
- "The recording and playback functionality is helpful."
- "The reporting is not very good."
What other advice do I have?
My advice for anybody who is considering JMeter is to just install it and try it. Creating scripts is a different process when you compare it to LoadRunner or Neoload. There is different terminology compare to these two products, so if somebody has not used JMeter then it may seem difficult at first. I would rate this solution a six out of ten.Get our free report covering Micro Focus, Micro Focus, Apache, and other competitors of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise. Updated: January 2021.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.