Integration with different modules such as:
Web Service -WS
Advanced File Transfer - AFT
Integration with different modules such as:
Web Service -WS
Advanced File Transfer - AFT
We use the Control-M modules to reduce the development time of the automations, using the modules.
Web Service -WS (We use to integrate with ODI e SOA)
Advansed File Transfer - AFT (We did an integration between several servers with a safe delivery)
I would like to see improvement in the integration of modules. As I worked with the modules, I saw the need for better integration several times.
In the case of a Web Service (WS) module, it could have more facilities with the integration of SOA services when an asynchronous service is invoked. When used for this purpose, it generates a number of unnecessary alerts to the operator dashboard.
We have been using this solution for five years.
I did not find it.
Most stability problems are network connected, i.e., communication goes down with servers where you have a client.
I did not encounter any issues with scalability.
Very good.
Technical Support:Technical support is very good.
I thought of using a different solution, but this solution is as simple as other alternatives.
Yes, I did. We change because of the integration facilities other market tools and to ensure a safe delivery of the company's files.
It was done through a vendor team with the support of the internal team.
Confidential.
This is quite specific. It will depend on the number of processes that you need to automate.
Yes we evaluated.
CA Workload Automation AE(AutoSys)
IBM Tivoli System Automation
Improve the disclosure of the modules for the clients and show the cases of success.