If we have an issue, it is useful for finding the root cause of incidences. So, we use it for troubleshooting.
If we have an issue, it is useful for finding the root cause of incidences. So, we use it for troubleshooting.
When we have a large issue, we bring our teams together, working with AppDynamics. This has allowed us to reduce the time to recover applications (for example).
I would like them to change their business model for scalability to accommodate growing companies. The business model should be more flexible.
I am okay with the stability.
The scalability is good. However, the issue is you need to know in advance how many agents that you will use. With companies similar to ours (in growth mode), this is difficult to forecast.
They have a very good customer service team that checks in with customers, asking about our experiences.
It took about two weeks to complete the entire implementation and integration of the product. It was easy.
With some training, we were able to implement and configure AWS with a little help.
It is expensive. However, our time to recover has been reduced, and this product has helped recuperate costs and provided us with ROI.
We did not originally evaluate any other solutions.
It is an interesting application. We have tried others: New Relic and Dynatrace. Finally, we decided to stay with AppDynamics because its graphical configuration is very intuitive for our teams to work on.
AppDynamics is doing a very good job.
We used it on-premise, then moved to AWS. On-premise is very similar to using AWS.