What is our primary use case?
The primary use that we have for Forcepoint Web Security is for server clusters plus multi-link sites, sites that require not multi-linked ISPs.
We use Forcepoint Web Security for multi-cluster servers with multi-links so that we can cluster all the multi-links into one link.
How has it helped my organization?
For our organization, when we initially deployed Forcepoint Web Security, we were looking to have four different ISP's joined, all the ISP's as one.
We wanted to utilize all of the network resources in a unified manner. We didn't want to waste other ISP resources. That is the reason why we purchased this firewall.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of Forcepoint Web Security is creating the easy to install policies that are deployed through the Forcepoint security manual at some stage. Just drag and drop and the policies are there. The cluster is very easy in comparison with other firewalls and the multi-link VPN support is there.
What needs improvement?
For improvement, we cannot deploy the Forcepoint Web Security firewall directly without ISP. The firewall doesn't have any features because some customers are requesting they will install the firewall without licensing.
At this time we cannot go further without licensing. Licensing is a must with Forcepoint Web Security firewalls.
I'm not sure that those features are included with Forcepoint Web Security. We checked the other features but we have not checked out their performance.
For how long have I used the solution?
More than five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of Forcepoint Web Security is very good. I have no issues from the customers. They are very happy with the product.
If you are testing any firewalls, there is no downtime with Forcepoint Web Security. We can directly upgrade our firewalls and we can remove the old plans. We can apply newer plans without any downtime.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability with Forcepoint I would rate with an eight out of ten. It is pretty scalable. You can upgrade if you want to expand.
We have a major customer, they are using it with more than 12,000 users. There are currently two security admins and a network admin. They're managing all the firewalls.
We have a total of 55 firewalls under Forcepoint Web Security. In a year, we are planning to buy new firewalls and expand.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support with Forcepoint Web Security is very good.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward. Deployment, like the initial setup, to configure with the licensing, can be done in two days.
Our use of Forcepoint Web Security is not built on the calculation or the policies, i.e. how the configuration will take place. Based on that, we have two different areas.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing on Forcepoint Web Security is fair. Fair pricing at current market rates, if you are comparing with the competition.
Forcepoint Web Security is better than Fortinet because Fortinet is free. They still come under the enterprise level of security implementation though.
What other advice do I have?
It is easy to deploy Forcepoint Web Security for whatever type of policies there are out there. We can manage any of our firewalls through one console. Our users prefer Forcepoint Web Security over any other firewall. We look for what the policy of the firewall is and through the console, we can run all the firewall settings.
With Forcepoint Web Security, we can push the policies to all the firewalls. For the upgrade, it can be implemented with no downtime.
I would rate Forcepoint Web Security an eight out of ten. It is easy so we can understand what the policies are and which policy belongs to which firewalls.
There is no downtime when we are building any firewalls. If any firewall goes down, there will be little to no impact.