The UI aspect of UiPath is more advantageous as it offers various features, including built-in traits and multiple packages, making it easier to develop. It is a low-code platform, which adds to its appeal.

After some research, my company specifically chose three tools, which were SmartBear TestComplete, TestProject, and Katalon Studio. From SmartBear TestComplete, TestProject, and Katalon Studio, my company chose TestProject. In the future, my company may again switch to Selenium from TestProject to reduce costs. Selenium is an open-source product, allowing my company to use it for free.

We evaluated both Leapwork and SmartBear, along with other automated testing solutions. Both products are really good. I like Leapwork because it is easier for people to use but the price was too high per user per year. SmartBear is easy to use as well but Leapwork is not a no-code solution, whereas SmartBear is a low-code solution.

We went with SmartBear mainly because we're also using SmartBear Swagger. We're already utilizing some of SmartBear's technology in-house and its cost per license per year is lower. That was the key factor in why we decided to go with SmartBear over LeapWork.

We went through quite a few of them. This product seemed best for usability and recording features.

We evaluated other options. We opted for TestComplete because of the price and ease of use. 

We have also been using Eggplant Functional, and the decision has been made to move forward with that solution, instead of SmartBear. It is not for technical reasons. I also find Eggplant to be a little bit pricey.

We did not evaluate other solutions.

We had a choice with Coded UI as we developed it using C#. However, TestComplete is the preferred choice one over coded UI, as it needed to grow more as a test tool.

I use several tools.

Our team occasionally does test other options. 

We're still kind of in the evaluation phase. The new requirements are still in development. So we're using this time to hang up our testing environment. 

We're looking for more COTS-based tools or tool so we don't have to do as much management. We want a tool that does the management as versions up and then we just lock it down.

No, I did a PoC and discovered the pros and cons.

QTP, TOSCA, RATIONAL, RANOREX

HP UFT was tried but the object recognition did not work with the implementation technology.

QTP, was very expensive when compared to TestComplete, many years ago.

We also evaluated another SmartBear product called SoapUI. The change to TestComplete occurred because we changed our target from web applications to desktop.

I did compare the tool to IBM Rational Functional Tester, Segue/Borland/Micro Focus SilkTest, and HPE Mercury Quick Test Professional.

I am currently investigating the differences between TestComplete and TestLeft.

I reviewed several products before deciding to continue our automation efforts using TestComplete. Among the products reviewed were Telerik TestStudio, Testing Anywhere, and Ranorex.

I didn't look at too many other options, however, this one had a special advantage in that it works on the Windows Operating System.

• QTP
• Selenium

I looked at various options like QuickTest Professional, Rational Functional Tester, and SilkTest.

Mainly, when we did an evaluation and comparison, TestComplete had two big advantages -

• Good technology support
• Relatively low price in comparison to other vendor tools

TestComplete was installed before I was hired, so I know nothing about this.

Right now, we're in the process of evaluating this product and Squish.

We also looked at Selenium IDE, and chose it because it's cheaper.

We looked at other solutions, but this was the most complete.

I have no idea.

Yes, JMeter.

We evaluated other options QTP.

I have evaluated other solutions, the cost model, the level of support of legacy software, the easy of use and easy implementation approach were main reasons to choose this product.

An evaluation of Microsoft competition found it to not be suitable for front-end testing (it was more suitable to integration testing).

Currently, we are not looking at any competition or changing or anything else.

We did evaluate other options, but I can’t recall which ones.