SmartBear TestComplete Review

Automated testing was used to validate security protocols for web applications


What is most valuable?

Automated testing was used to validate security protocols for web applications.

How has it helped my organization?

It is easier to store and execute test cases, track test results, and save time with automation.

What needs improvement?

LoadComplete could be a little more user-friendly, but is still better than LoginVSI. Network issues sometimes made for poor connections.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have used this solution for one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I did not encounter any issues with stability. The product was available within expected measures.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I did not encounter any issues with scalability.

How is customer service and technical support?

I would rate the level of technical support as excellent.

Which solutions did we use previously?

We switched from HPE QC/ALM. It did not offer automation on the same scale.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was made easier with professional services. Learning to code was harder.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I tell people it is cheaper than ALM with the same features and better UI.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did evaluate other options, but I can’t recall which ones.

What other advice do I have?

Make sure you have a large volume of testing to transfer. Otherwise, it is not worth the money.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Add a Comment
Guest
Sign Up with Email