The ability to scale is outstanding, easily a nine out of ten. It's very suitable for large, multi-geography companies but also very suitable for medium companies with multi-geography operations. 

For smaller companies, it depends on their size and ambition. Now, SAP has various solutions that can work even for smaller organizations. So, the size limitation isn't a factor anymore. It's more about your organization's complexity and geographic spread. 

Even a small company with, say, 1,000-2,000 employees operating in Europe, the US, and Southeast Asia or Middle East and Africa needs globally compliant software. In such a case, you require software that is compliant globally. So, the old factor of size is irrelevant. 

The geographic spread and complexity of the organization determine usability.

Our organization has 300 SAP HCM users working from the finance, administration, HR, and engineering departments. I rate the scalability a seven or eight. It is a scalable product.

It is a very scalable product.

SAP HCM is a scalable solution.

We have over 20 clients using this solution.

It is a scalable product. The number of users varies for different organizations. I have been a part of a company with over 20,000 users. On the other hand, there was a company with only 200 users. I have worked with a different range of employees.

It is a scalable solution. 

Scaling is just a matter of changing the license and there aren't any problems with that. My current customer using this solution has about 5,000 employees. SAP HCM is suitable for enterprise companies. 

SAP HCM is a scalable solution.

The solution is scalable, and my company has more than 40,000 users for it. 

The solution has chain management, so it is scalable and climbing up. Some of my clients are smaller and medium-sized businesses, while others are enterprises.

It is a scalable solution. For other modules, it's around 100 to 200 users in my company. We had 12 administrators.

It is scalable. We have approximately 1,300 employees in our organization. They are using the system either directly or indirectly. Indirectly in the sense that we have the employee portal, where the employees actually use the self-service portal and can do their own things, like leave applications. Almost everyone in the organization uses the system, but of course in a different way.

Right now, we don't have any plans to increase usage in the future.

It is definitely scalable because we have an on-premises solution. It is very simple to add memory, processor, or disk capacity.

600-700 people use this solution in our company. The supply chain management department, internal audit department, IT, and the administration department use SAP HCM. 

It is a scalable solution. There are three administrators maintaining the solution: an HR person, a payroll person, and one backup.

The solution is challenging to scale compared to Oracle, which is easier to understand. Our organization has over 100 solutions users from the material management, finance, and networking departments.

No scalability issues.

The cost is contingent on scalability. If you're seeking consultant-level insight, it involves a comprehensive HCM package rather than just managing at the employee level. Scalability is crucial, with consultants providing the necessary resources, expertise, and training to elevate teams efficiently—at a lower or higher level. In my company, which uses SAP HCL, maintenance involves overseeing four users at my level, including three team members, one of whom is a two-year female employee. Additionally, there's one consultant and two employees at the certificate level. Looking at the entire organization, I manage maintenance for sixteen thousand users.

SAP HCM has very good scalability. Our clients for SAP HCM are enterprise businesses.

I rate the solution an eight out of ten for scalability.

SAP HCM is a scalable product.

We have approximately 32,000 users in our organization who use this solution.

The scalability is good. We have between 1,000 and 3,000 users.

It was easy to scale out to three different regions.

There were about 50 users, but about 10 to 15 users were executives approving the subworkflow in the system.

As far as I know, there is limitless scalability.

It seems to me that it should be obvious that this product is very scalable just because it is made by SAP.  

SAP HCM is scalable, the client can modify according to their needs.

We have approximately 500 people using this solution.

There were a lot of defects that I had to deal with because patches were coming out on a regular basis and it required a lot of time.

I was heavily involved in UAT and there were lots of configuration issues. There were development requests and I had to deal with the developers directly, which was a bit of a headache.

It is used globally for more than 80 countries.

I have not encountered any scalability issues so far.

Previously, SAP HCM On-Premise was more scalable.

The scalability of the solution is okay. It's possible to expand it. that's not a problem.

We have about 20 to 30 people using the product within our organization.

We do not plan to increase usage. We are not planning to continue to use it at all. We are moving away from it entirely.

It is scalable.

I did not have any problems with scalability.

The scalability of the solution is similar to other SAP products. It's okay. You can expand a license to include more customers, even if you've started with only a few users. 

I have not encountered any stability issues.

SAP HCM is scalable.

There could be cases where the first configuration is not done in the most perfect way, in these cases some issues arise.

The scalability of the solution is good.

I have found SAP HCM to be scalable.

We have about 300 people on the solution currently.

The solution is quite scalable.