TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Overview

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is the #28 ranked solution in our list of BPM Software. It is most often compared to Camunda Platform: TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM vs Camunda Platform

What is TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is used to develop, deploy, execute and manage Business Process Management centric applications. Use TIBCO Business Studio BPM Edition in conjunction with ActiveMatrix BPM to model business processes. It helps to encompass applications that primarily automate both: business processes (sequences of tasks) to be executed by human users, and technical processes (the flow of data) to be executed by enterprise applications.
Buyer's Guide

Download the Business Process Management (BPM) Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: June 2021

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Customers

ADIS, Citi, Bank of Montreal, First Citizens Bank

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Video

Pricing Advice

What users are saying about TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM pricing:
  • "There are some discussions about perpetual licenses and conversions, but I'm not much familiar with them."

Filter Reviews

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
ITCS user
Technical Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Highly stable in production and easy to use for testing and deployment

What is our primary use case?

It is used for on-premises and cloud integrations. It has a number of products for on-premises integration.

Pros and Cons

  • "It is the best product because of its stability. ActiveMatrix 5.x is highly stable in production, and the downtime is very low. I have worked on a lot of service projects, and the engine is very stable, robust, and scalable. The development and change requests can be pushed quickly, and the mapper activity and SSLT kind of features are also good. It is easy to do changes, testing, and deployment. Its deployment is very easy, and we can automate a lot of scripts for our on-premises solution. I work for an investment bank, and we have automated a lot of processes for our customers. Previously, we used to develop scripts and tools. With version 6.x, everything is moved to Maven and other things. Environment handling is done mostly through DevOps tools. As compared to Mulesoft, the deployment and configuration are very easy in TIBCO."
  • "ActiveMatrix is in the middle field. MuleDB is more on the engineering side with Java and other things. SnapLogic is there are on the higher side with very low coding. TIBCO stays in the middle like IBM or Oracle. TIBCO can move towards IBM's way of doing. IBM has a big market and many varieties of products and good integration, which TIBCO doesn't have. It can have better integration. TIBCO's transition to the cloud is a little slow. As compared to Dell, Boomi, and Mulesoft. TIBCO took the steps a little later. TIBCO's ID was far better and easier to work with previously. TIBCO's 5.x ID was very good, and the development environment and the transition were easy. Version 6.5 onwards, it is a stable product, but it would be good if they can do something similar to version 5.4 with version 6. They should concentrate on this API market. It will give them the strength and the ability to grab the market back."

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend this solution. It is a highly stable, robust, scalable solution. I would rate TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM an eight out of ten.
FP
Senior Consultant at Provincia
Consultant
An easy to use solution with a straightforward setup that occasionally lacks stability

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use is for internal governance.

What other advice do I have?

We use the on-premises deployment model. I would rate the solution seven out of ten. Sometimes it's not stable, but it is a complete solution. It takes time for development. An hour for development, is a long time, for example, in my opinion. It is easy to use but has many black box complaints. You have to write to support because of these complications.