SmartBear TestComplete Review

It supports .Net, but it needs to have templates of tests from scratch.

What is most valuable?

  • Good IDE
  • Support of third party controls
  • Flexible in coding
  • Supports .Net assemblies
  • Good community

How has it helped my organization?

It's decreased the time needed for the regression testing cycle.

What needs improvement?

  • Memory consumption
  • Speed of interaction with controls
  • Sets of prepared libraries like asserts
  • Templates of tests from scratch

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used TestComplete for three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's stable.

How are customer service and technical support?

It's good, I like the support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Previously was QTP. TestComplete is much more flexible light,and easy to use.

How was the initial setup?

It's quite easy to start using it. There were no problems from the beginning.

What about the implementation team?

Use JScript for quick wins. Start creating tests as small as possible.

What was our ROI?

I would say that we have now automated about 100 tests, so it saves us three days every month..

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Which version of this solution are you currently using?

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More SmartBear TestComplete reviews from users
...who work at a Computer Software Company
...who compared it with Eggplant Functional
Learn what your peers think about SmartBear TestComplete. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2020.
454,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment