webMethods Integration Server Review

Provides a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces

What is our primary use case?

We're using it for managing secure file transfers for the company.

How has it helped my organization?

We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces.

What is most valuable?

Ease of use.

What needs improvement?

The newest version, which we are not on, has all the features that we are looking for, meaning managed files transfer adapter.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is stable. They are rather aggressive in their patches and upgrades.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It seems to be doing very well.

How are customer service and technical support?

We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not use another solution previously.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

We enlisted help from the reseller with the initial setup.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I have only heard of Software AG, Talend, and MuleSoft.

What other advice do I have?

Look at the stability of the company, and also take a close look at the pricing. Lower pricing doesn't necessarily mean it's a better product.

Most important criteria when selecting a vendor:

  • Price
  • Features
  • Support.

Which version of this solution are you currently using?

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More webMethods Integration Server reviews from users
...who work at a Manufacturing Company
...who compared it with Mule ESB
Learn what your peers think about webMethods Integration Server. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2021.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment