IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services Competitors and Alternatives

Read reviews of IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services competitors and alternatives
B7b0b393 c626 4715 8dbe a706e5688f45 avatar
Real User
Integration Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Jul 17 2017

What is most valuable?

* Capability to handle almost all e-business standards: RosettaNet, EDI, ebXML Messaging Service, SWIFT, FIX, and CIDX * Web-based user interface: Makes administration and monitoring much easier * Segregation of user tasks: Controlled user... more»

How has it helped my organization?

* We could set up all trading partners in one place with different data transfer protocols * Makes the middleware environment more efficient * Helps the admin team: Has a clear view on transactions and their processing status without digging... more»

What needs improvement?

Configuration and interaction of trading partners in the TN with an ActiveTransfer product.
614cbb39 6d99 45cd b31f 2d09984d610e avatar
Real User
Self Employed/Independent at a consultancy
Aug 24 2017

What is most valuable?

MuleSoft offers with the Anypoint Platform a unified platform for API management and an integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) as well as an on-premise Enterprise Service Bus pattern. The iPaaS and API management are offered on CloudHub,... more»

How has it helped my organization?

I worked for a MuleSoft partner for four years before going independent mid 2017.

What needs improvement?

MuleSoft's release calendar is rather conventional with two major, two minor releases and hotfixes in between. The competition sometimes offer more rapid release cycles and provides improved and new functionality with a faster time-to-market.
Anonymous avatar x80
Real User
IT Analyst at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Oct 28 2016

What do you think of Avada Software Infrared360?

Improvements to My Organization The ability for development teams to have access to their MQ queues has freed us up as administrators to do things other than chase down an application’s message for research purposes. • Valuable Features - Monitoring that ties into our incident management system - Visibility of the MQ environment to non-MQ personnel • Room for Improvement The UI can be cumbersome - but we are still using the Viper interface and we have not had the time to check out the Alloy interface which is supposed to be much improved. • Stability Issues Not really, other than minor memory leaks. But a monthly cycling of the server is usually all that is required (which we have to do for patching anyways). • Scalability Issues We have not really pushed the...

Sign Up with Email