Ranorex Competitors and Alternatives

Read reviews of Ranorex competitors and alternatives
SmartBear Software
Real User
Test Analyst
Jul 31 2017

What do you think of SmartBear TestComplete?

Valuable Features One of the valuable features is object identification. It provides the different options to users so they can uniquely identify the objects. • Improvements to My Organization By automating the regression test cases, it has increased effective testing process and reduced the cycle time. • Room for Improvement I would like to see recovery scenarios. • Use of Solution I have been using this solution for over four years. • Stability Issues I did not encounter any issues with stability. • Scalability Issues I did not encounter any issues with scalability. • Customer Service and Technical Support I would give technical support a rating of 8/10. • Previous Solutions When we started using this tool, only TestComplete provided the...
Micro Focus
Jan 22 2018

What is most valuable?

* Record and Replay to ease onboarding of new users. * Object Repository Technology, which is a good mean to identify graphical components of the applications under test.

How has it helped my organization?

With frequent releases, using automation to perform regression testing can save us huge amount of time and resources. It has allowed us to focus on newly added features.

What needs improvement?

Initially, it was supporting only Internet Explorer. This was not an issue, as the corporate choice, was to use that browser. In the meantime, Firefox and Google Chrome became popular and were introduced within the company, hence scripting... more»
Micro Focus
Real User
QA Expert at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Aug 14 2017

What do you think of Quality Center?

Valuable Features REST API. It lets me do what I need to do, instead of what HPE Quality Center does on its own. • Improvements to My Organization By using the REST API, I have automated QA Reporting, and integrated QA information into the development build process. • Room for Improvement Its performance is horrible, and it's unnecessarily complex, which means the local site administrators set it up to be used in very unproductive ways. • Use of Solution 10 years (including earlier versions). • Stability Issues Yes. While most of it is introduced by our poor local setup, that is a direct outcome of my complaint mentioned in the need for improvement. • Scalability Issues Yes, but again this mostly do with how we implemented it locally. Again, it is an outcome...

Sign Up with Email