SQL Server is quite stable. And now we are using the Lattice 2017 version.
I have seen that this is a very stable product.
It is reliable. It's very stable.
When we are not able to solve a problem we immediately contacted Oracle support team to help us solve it.
It is very easy to install and has all basic database features.
It was easy to install.
SAP HANA is vertically and horizontally scalable.
The initial setup is straightforward. It usually takes around eight months but it depends on a customer's requirements. We can spend a month or two customizing.
Db2 Database has given us good results since we have started to use it. We predominantly use IBM hardware, and this is one of the reasons why we started to use Db2 Database. Db2 Database has a very good HADR capability. High availability resilience is also good in this solution. It also has pureScale, which allows you to upgrade one node to get very good and high-level resilience. If you are using a database on five nodes, you can take one node down, upgrade that, and let that node up. You can then bring the second node down, upgrade that, and so on.
It's a pre-configured appliance that requires very little in terms of setting-up.
The functionality of the solution is excellent.
We use MariaDB for identity provider services. Most of the things that we are doing are deployed in the container mode. All such solutions require a database, and MariaDB is easier to use for these kinds of deployments.
For IoT business cases, having Informix Enterprise Edition work on edge computers, like Raspberry Pi and using Informix replication, makes complex situations simple to build and maintain.
Advice From The CommunityRead answers to top Relational Databases questions. 455,164 professionals have gotten help from our community of experts.
See more Relational Databases questions »
DLAMUser at MH
I work for a healthcare company with less than 1,000 employees. I am new to FileMaker Pro but my company uses FileMaker Pro (FM Pro) as the frontend development tool. More and more applications will be built using FM Pro. In the long run : 1. Is FM Pro Embedded DB or MS SQL Server a better choice in the long run for the backend database? 2. What are the pros and cons of using these two databases if we must use FileMaker Pro as the front end tool? 3. If MS SQL Server has been chosen, will there be any compromise with FileMaker Pro on areas such as functionalities, features, programming methods, etc? Thanks! I appreciate your help.
What is Relational Databases?
The purpose of Relational Database Management (RDBMS) is to maintain various digital software system databases. Querying and maintaining aspects of the database is achieved by using SQL, (Structured Query Language) which is universally accepted by almost all relational database systems. An RDMBS manages, builds and deploys applications located onsite or in the cloud. The digital space has a lot of competition and finding the best RDBMS requires IT experts to source the most comprehensive technology.
According to IT Central Station IT professionals, operational performance, (OLTP, DWH - ETL) security, support for developer APIs, and MDX support are among the most important RDMBS features. Scalability and modeling must be easy to use, and responsive vendor support is especially desirable. Data capacity, integration, and speed are integral to the needs of IT and DevOps.
Because IT managers have multiple needs within RDMBS, criteria for choosing a vendor requires the strictest data integrity and offer project specifications such as, “[a] distributed SQL database that has a flexible deployment model allowing the [team] to run the database on a single server machine, across machines in a data center or public cloud, and even on a global basis (across multiple data centers) without having to architect a new solution for each use case.”
IT Central Station IT and Devops managers are clear about how RDMBSs and their many features can function in an enterprise environment to be best leveraged in DevOps. There is a need for parallel distribution and parallel computing when evaluating performance.
One topic that is frequently discussed is, “transactional atomicity.” With all the moving parts in Relational Databases, the granular can become the springboard for success. These include loading and unloading data, meeting performance and recovery time objectives and adherence to standards.
IT Central Station developers have specific standards and would choose RDMBS based on whether the “DB comes with a mature BI stack.” RDMBS has many variables. IT Central Station users chose Relational Databases based on a number of criteria. IT Central Station’s offerings are complete and wide-ranging for the needs of IT and DevOps teams looking for agile excellence.