SharePoint Previous Solutions
VW
VINCENTWU
Project Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
I used the old version SharePoint and it had a lack of integration with MS Teams, Instant Message, and the web portable for file sharing. This new version is better than the old version as you can do file sharing without a corporate mechanism.
Most of all, I liked that I did not even need to install MS Office and am now using MS Office Cloud within the web office format. It is truly a well-integrated application.
View full review »SS
Sam Scott
IT Manager at The Ventoulis Institute for Local Journalism
We've always used Microsoft here, so we didn't use any other solution.
View full review »AS
Andy Sworan
VP, CRS Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
You can deploy a web/database solution but it will take a lot of development time. SharePoint is a Rapid Application Development platform where a simple library, indexed, can be deployed in minutes.
Buyer's Guide
SharePoint
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about SharePoint. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
This is the first time using it at this company.
View full review »CB
Chaan Beard
Senior Data Center Solutions Architect at ChaanBeard.com
We used NetMax. The OpenStack Linux stuff is hacked like no other.
View full review »BW
BillWatterson
CEO l Founder at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees
I used HPE Content Manager, formerly TRIM software, which used to be owned by TRIM here in Australia. We used TRIM a lot, then it was bought out by HPE, HPE has now been bought out by Microsoft.
Our organization chose SharePoint because they wanted to become accredited with Microsoft. They saw that Microsoft was the industry leader, so everyone wanted Microsoft. They saw Microsoft as the way forward, at the time.
View full review »We used an open-source CMS (Joomla-based) and due to the limitations, we switched to SharePoint.
View full review »I have always used Microsoft SharePoint for my projects.
View full review »What motivated us to switch solutions was the easy solution management, space scalability, additional features, easy synchronization, data security, and sharing control.
RC
Ram Chenna
Enterprise Architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Some of our client were first time users of SharePoint so going from no prior system for document storage, collaboration, content management, workflows, application development platform was a boon.
For all of our client who have moved from one version to another version of the product, they always found the product improved in terms of features and functionality and performance.
View full review »CR
Cecil Rupp
Works at Command Results, LLC.
NO, client requires use of SharePoint for content management on IT programs and projects.
View full review »LW
Lewin Wanzer
SharePoint Architect at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
I was a FileNet administrator but switched to SharePoint because of the integration of the Office products. I know that FileNet is a great product as well, but Microsoft has done a great job of integrating SharePoint with the Office suite. This drove my decision to move to SharePoint as a support engineer.
View full review »We used to employ Oracle UCM, but we replaced it because of the features provided in SharePoint along with the customizations, flexibility and ease of creating websites, workflows, pages and applications.
View full review »There's nothing truly like SharePoint in the marketplace that I'm aware of. You can use wiki's of various sorts and cobble together any number of open source or paid solutions that address a component of what SharePoint does. But that approach doesn't have the current product's level of integration and the maturity of its feature set.
View full review »Initially, we were MS OneNote.
View full review »Initially, we were using simple file shares and emails for this purpose.
View full review »We used several single purpose software tools for each area of our need. We switched to MS SharePoint/Office 365 for a number of reasons, including: the seamless integration between the many apps in the suite; colleagues (users) are familiar with the MS office interface from Excel, Outlook, Word and PowerPoint and that shortens the learning curve considerably.
View full review »We previously used a solution called Hornbill (Supportworks); it was out of date and had less flexibility in customization and no access to the source code level.
View full review »We did not have a similar solution in place. Our intranet was previously an added product to our hosted CMS. And for Capital Projects, we were using a mixture of standalone Microsoft Project install and file shares.
View full review »Previously, I have used HP document solutions. I made the switch to SharePoint as it was what the client was using.
View full review »I did not previously use a different solution.
View full review »I have used Google and still do today. It is less expensive as a personal solution to document management, archiving and collaboration. It also integrates with my personal Google e-mail solution.
View full review »We have always used the SharePoint content management system.
For document management, we use IBM FileNet, which is great for managing document but poor with collaboration tools.
View full review »I’ve not used any other tools.
View full review »FR
director194919
Director, Systems Management & MIS Operations at a university with 201-500 employees
I previously used a different solution; switched because of ease of use and deployment.
View full review »I always used Sharepoint.
View full review »Previously, we used enQuira to store questions.
View full review »I previously used SharePoint Services 3, SharePoint Server 2007/2010/2013. Now, I am using SharePoint Online 2016 in a hybrid model that has new features and some new innovations. There are many reasons to switch.
View full review »RB
SysMan2876
System Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
The switch was handed to our default supplier of software, in this case, Microsoft. The whole platform we used was based on Microsoft.
It's not a vendor we select, we select a product. After that, we look at the vendor. If the product looks good, promising, and it looks stable - and of course we test it before we go any further with it - then we look at the vendor, especially the support. Then we find other cases, where they have implemented a similar product or feature and ask for their feedback.
We had no other solutions before this one.
View full review »I am not aware of any previous solutions. I always use Cognos solutions for my BI needs.
View full review »Prior to this product, I have not used any other solution.
View full review »We never tried to implement a solution other than SharePoint.
View full review »We used various methods to achieve the same results shared folders and third party document management solutions, e.g. Documentum.
View full review »N/A. SharePoint was the original solution.
View full review »We did not have a previous solution.
View full review »We did not have anything before.
View full review »I did not previously use a different solution.
View full review »Before SharePoint, we used internally designed websites, WordPress and Drupal. We found that they did not provide the collaboration features and integration that we would have liked.
View full review »We were not using any other solution previously.
View full review »We did not have a previous solution.
View full review »WH
Wissam H
Change Management Consultant at a analyst firm with self employed
I did not previously use a different solution.
View full review »Our previous system was shared folders and file and print servers.
View full review »YD
Yatin Dalvi
Senior Industry Expert with 1,001-5,000 employees
We did not use a previous solution. We did upgrade from SharePoint 2010 to SharePoint 2013.
View full review »We did not have a previous solution.
View full review »We tried ShareDrive and Confluence. We stay with SharePoint because of the indexed content and corporate licenses.
View full review »To my knowledge, we have always used SharePoint. We have not switched away from SharePoint because of its AD integration; it makes automatic permissions that much easier.
View full review »We didn't have anything that did this before.
View full review »PK
Seniop9887
Director at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
We did not have a previous solution, other than mail-messaging and Excel.
View full review »We used solutions from the Java world. Those, as well as this one, are based on the customers' needs.
View full review »We are using a different on-premise platform. The plan is to migrate to Sharepoint online for our document management and business process applications.
We are switching in order to:
- Migrate to a cloud platform
- Maximize our investment in the Office 365 platform
- Consolidate platforms
- Provide a more accessible, standardized, and integrated platform for our users.
We did not previously use a different solution.
View full review »I have seen customers using other tools and switching to SharePoint. Technology upgrades and feature upgrades are the key reasons for this.
View full review »We used SharePoint 2010 on premise. We switched due to the license cost and to give access to all our company users. Also, because SPO was included in the Office 365 plans. As a SaaS, it is always up to date.
View full review »SR
Sunny Rajpal
Senior SharePoint Architect at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
We were previously using a custom solution that was hard to maintain and there was also lack of user adoption. With SP, we were able to see great improvement in those areas.
View full review »I did not use a previous solution.
View full review »I did not use any other solutions prior to SharePoint and I would not change to another product either.
View full review »VO
VeyselOzdemir
Managing Director at Ictnet Limited
FileNet and Documentum.
View full review »We used to use simple file shares and emails.
View full review »We did not have any previous solutions.
View full review »We upgraded from SharePoint 2007 and 2010. Data migration was the biggest culprit. The main reason for an upgrade was to provide easier platform management.
We had a Small Business Server environment which has a cap in the user environment. Since we grew out of the number of users, we had to change. Microsoft Office 365 was the fastest and most powerful way for both short and long term vision.
View full review »
We did not have a previous solution.
View full review »Our company has used other solutions to meet various needs. We are still in the process of converting into using SharePoint for our knowledge base, etc.
View full review »We used the older version, Microsoft SharePoint 2010.
Our reason to upgrade was Microsoft decided to stop its support for SharePoint 2010 aand also because our license was soon going to expire.
View full review »RK
Kumar_Rajesh
Vice President & Head Technology Transition at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Previously, we were using file share. We switched because SharePoint made things easier with the increased functionality for building the portals, microsites, and total integration with Microsoft categories.
View full review »CN
Caressa Naidoo
Technical Writer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We were previously using a network drive that we accessed directly from our laptops and desktops. There was simply no control of information and documentation; and loss of information occurred. There were inadequate, non-existent, or deep folder structures, messy content structures, and a lack of document management and control. Versioning was done manually. Important documentation with sensitive information was being stored on local drives. Updated templates and documentation were not being used.
View full review »Our intranet portal was based on in-house development. We moved from legacy to a standard product.
View full review »We did not use a previous solution.
View full review »We were not using any other solution.
View full review »Prior to this solution, we used shared files provided by the operating system.
View full review »We were using SharePoint 2007. We changed due to the product lifecycle.
View full review »Previously, we used custom ASP.NET application. We wanted to use SharePoint because it is easy to deploy in a new environment and has out-of-the box functionalities like AD authentication, file versioning, wiki pages, .NET extensible, etc.
View full review »We did not have a previous solution.
View full review »We have used no other tool prior to SharePoint.
View full review »As already mentioned, our previous documentation solution was manual, using a folder structure accessible through Windows Explorer.
The switch to SharePoint was motivated by the desire to improve availability of our documentation and to streamline our document management processes.
View full review »We did not have a previous solution.
View full review »I did not previously use a different solution.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
SharePoint
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about SharePoint. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.