Citrix NetScaler ADC vs. Citrix NetScaler VPX

Citrix NetScaler ADC is ranked 2nd in Application Delivery Controllers with 20 reviews vs Citrix NetScaler VPX which is ranked 10th in Application Delivery Controllers with 1 review. The top reviewer of Citrix NetScaler ADC writes "SSL VPN works very well; it's easy to set up and you can go very granular with it". The top reviewer of Citrix NetScaler VPX writes "Rewriting and redirection are key features for us". Citrix NetScaler ADC is most compared with F5 BIG-IP, KEMP LoadMaster and A10 Networks Thunder ADC. Citrix NetScaler VPX is most compared with F5 BIG-IP, HAProxy and Citrix NetScaler ADC.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Андрей Шевченко
Use Null Product? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers.
306,037 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Citrix NetScaler ADC vs. Citrix NetScaler VPX

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
It is the best product out there.It has an easy user experience and user interface. The security is effective and better than its competitors.This product protects us from Internet attacks using its firewall features to block any attacks.Scalability is great. One of the best features of NetScaler is that it can scale out.This solution allows the user to easily scale out application delivery, and provides secure remote access.One feature that works really well is the SSL VPN. It's very easy to set up and you can go very granular with it. You can define what user groups get what kind of access and the management overhead is very low.I like the monitoring ability as it enables me to identify when an internal (load-balanced) resource is having issues before it becomes a problem in production.Content Switching provides flexibility for routing traffic as desired to designated real servers. It also provides good geo capabilities through its GSLB feature.

Read more »

Enables a Web service that offers persistent client-server connections, IP restriction, URL rewrite (such as remove "/assets/" path from client-side URL path), and cache for CSS or JS files... You can easily use the GUI to set up all these requirements on the same network device within 20-30 minutes. (If you do the same steps on CLI, it might take less time.)If you need PCI-compliance and have high security requirements, WAF is the most valuable feature. If you need to monitor your load-balancing services with complex types of monitoring, make sure everything is alright, and load balancing is important, Content Switching and Monitoring features are the keys to your needs. If you want to provide a lot of static images or data, the Caching feature works best for you.I would say the rewriting and redirection functions are must-have's for us.

Read more »

Read more »

Cons
It can be difficult to setup.We would like to see more monitoring features going forward, because the current product monitoring options are not enough for security usage.I would like to see more integration for single sign-on.Should offer more flexible cost-effective licensing for small to medium sized organizations.The customization has always been a key area where some improvements are required. In the beginning, everything was for customizing the outer shell of it. You had to use the command-based utility and you had to do a lot of manual work. They have improved it a little bit and now there are some GUI-based functionalities that can be used. However, more can be done that doesn't require a lot of intervention. Right now there are some features, there are some customizations that can be done, but it's still very tedious, very cumbersome, a lot of work. So that could be simplified.In every release - and it doesn't matter if it's a minor release or a major release - they keep moving things around and they keep changing the mechanism. So certain things can work in one version one way, and everything works really well, then when you upgrade it to the next version, it breaks everything because they have a new way of doing it.Development team's response time could be better.Needs configuration processes like disabling LB VIPs, automatically disabling the IPs used.

Read more »

We had some bugs in the previous firmware. These were not big issues, but more testing on the firmware would be key to happier customers.

Read more »

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
I do not have any experience with the pricing of the product.We are quite happy with price. It's not too high.The licencing model that we bought has been good. The licencing model is more flexible.We have been evaluating F5, Citrix, and other ADC products. Citrix is the most expense of all of them.It is true that it is a bit pricey compared to newer technologies coming to the market. For example, A10 is a load balancer that does everything that Citrix can and it does a lot more than what NetScaler does when it comes to the security space, and their prices are so cheap. Every box comes with its own license and support built into it. When you compare that with NetScaler, you have to buy licenses separately, you have to buy a support agreement that is going to be separate. A small NetScaler, even if it is a VPX which is a virtual server, could cost you close to $150,000 to $200,000 dollars. So the pricing is really high.It all depends on the features that will be used and the number of accesses.Costly product and complicated licensing.It's not for startups or SOHO.

Read more »

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers solutions are best for your needs.
306,037 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
14,106
Comparisons
7,312
Reviews
20
Followers
439
Avg. Rating
8.8
Views
782
Comparisons
687
Reviews
1
Followers
32
Avg. Rating
9.0
Unranked
In Application Delivery Controllers
Top Comparisons
Compared 45% of the time.
See more Citrix NetScaler ADC competitors »
Compared 38% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
See more Citrix NetScaler VPX competitors »
Compared 29% of the time.
Also Known As
NetScaler
Learn how it works
Citrix
Citrix
Null Vendor
Video Not Available
Overview
Citrix NetScaler is deployed in thousands of networks around the globe to optimize, secure and control the delivery of all enterprise and cloud services, and to maximize the end user experience for all users including mobile clients.

NetScaler VPX provides the complete NetScaler web and application load balancing, secure and remote access, acceleration, security and offload feature set in a simple, easy-to-install virtual appliance. IT organizations, cloud and telecom service providers of any size can deploy NetScaler VPX on industry standard hypervisors—on demand—anywhere in the datacenter.

Information Not Available
OFFER
Learn more about Citrix NetScaler ADC
Learn more about Citrix NetScaler VPX
Learn more about Null Product
Sample Customers
ABB Schweiz, Aer Lingus, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Amnet Technology Solutions, Aramex International, Ascenty, Atos, Autodesk Arizona State University (ASU)
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company
30%
Healthcare Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Pharma/Biotech Company
10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
19%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Pharma/Biotech Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
10%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
26%
Midsize Enterprise
35%
Large Enterprise
39%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
18%
Midsize Enterprise
18%
Large Enterprise
64%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers.
Download now
306,037 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email