VMware vSphere Other Advice
Speaking about the application deployment process, I work at the L1 level in my company. In my company, the L3 is a different department that manages the application deployment process, and most of them go for tools apart from the ones under VMware to manage the VMs. I am only creating new VMs and assigning RAM space, and if something comes up, then I create new RHEL-based systems.
When it comes to the application deployment process, my company manually deploys the applications. For automation purposes, our company uses Jenkins to collect the logs and provide a GUI with the help of a username and password to the end user, after which they can collect the logs from Jenkins.
I work at an L1 level in my company. The integrations and infrastructure-related areas of the product are managed by another team in my company.
I recommend the product to those who plan to use it.
Nowadays, people don't prefer to go for cloud-based solutions. Most of the companies prefer VMware as they want some level of security in the environment. VMware allows users to have in-house products. Most companies or banks are not moving over to cloud-based tools. VMware is used in banking systems.
I rate the tool an eight out of ten.
I would advise you to check out the VMware website and watch some of the initial and fundamental courses. The web console is very intuitive, but it can be helpful to see how it works before you start using it.
Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
View full review »VMware is a great virtualization solution. But, if your servers are very performance-demanded, my suggestion is you must also study the shared vLUN, SAN VV and VM’s IOPs requirement. Don’t just create vLUN and dump any VM into the vLUN. Some programmers and DBAs do not have ideas of how much IOPs their applications or database servers are needed. You will experience performance issues. This is not a problem when you use physical server because physical server resources are not shared.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
VMware vSphere
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about VMware vSphere. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
I would definitely recommend using the solution. I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
I would advise to be sure that the functionality brought by VMware aligns with the good functionality because there are other products in the market like ISPs, KV M, Oracle, Microsoft, and some other stuff. And VMware is a well-known product. But to be sure that the functionality provided by VMware is needed.
View full review »BK
Brian Kirsch
Instructor at Milwaukee Area Technical College
I would rate it as a nine out of ten.
Go big with your hardware. You have to be willing to invest in the hardware platform. Storage is key. Make sure you have enough performance with it. When you're looking at the actual overall product, make sure you understand what third party offerings you need to put in. It could be something from VMware or one of the partners, but it's going to be more that just the VMware Suite. There will be one or two things you need to add to it. Specifically, monitoring or reporting will be the big draws.
I don't have a percentage for the performance boost of the apps. However, there is noticeably different speed of how the database is working and how you move through the client. Everything is a bit more responsive. Part of that was getting rid of the flash client as well. We're seeing an overall general performance increase in everything we do, whether it's the monitoring aspect or deploying.
View full review »BS
Bunmi-Sadiq
IT Supervisor at APM Terminals, Inc.
The advice I would give is that there should be proper planning for implementing VMware solutions. With us, the content management suppliers and the various vendors provided this.
If VMware vSphere is the particular product you are choosing, consider where the sellers were located and if they have a knowledge of the product.
- Do the suppliers have the right models for your business?
- Do the suppliers have different VMware licenses available?
- Will you be able to enjoy the VMware license discount with the manufacturer?
- Does the integrator company have good partners in the supply chain?
If you just launch a VMware deployment without planning, it is not advised. Engage with all management and staff, then do proper planning before going into vSphere implementation.
No product is perfect but VMware vSphere is absolutely excellent. It has issues, i.e. the result of insufficient speeds, but no product is 100% perfect. That is why I would give it a nine out of ten rating.
With VMware vSphere, it is easy to manage the scaling of our company's virtual infrastructure.
VMware vSphere helps our company's customers in the area of virtualization since it provides good scalability features. In the government sector, people need to engage in a lot of documentation work when purchasing new hardware, and it can be helpful to use the product in such a scenario. In any environment, the product is easy to scale for general usage.
VMware vSphere's high availability or FT feature is used by our company's customers in their clusters to keep their servers available as much as they can. The use of the product ensures minimum downtime, and its users prefer to use the high availability feature of the tool.
The performance and efficiency of the use of the solution have improved our company's customers' organizations. From the use of VMware vSphere, the performance and efficiency of your customers have increased by 30 to 40 percent.
I rate the tool an eight out of ten.
Since I am an engineer, I troubleshoot the issues I face. I recommend people use a public cloud provider. If someone requires a separate data center, they can choose VMware. It is the best solution on-premises and as a private cloud. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.
View full review »vSphere has the DRS site. We got the recovery site feature, but we haven't used it. It's good to use the high availability to be more than AWS. We have many weekly metrics running on these.
Overall, I rate the solution an 8 out of 10.
JO
Johan Odendaal
Server Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
We're just customers.
We are a little behind the latest version, which I believe is 7.1. We're using 6.5 for the most part. We still have a little bit of a legacy in 5.5, however, that is just hardware related. It doesn't support the newer version. We trying to rectify that as soon as possible.
I would recommend the solution to other companies.
Overall, I would rate the solution nine out of ten.
View full review »KD
Kim Dijkstra
Technical manager at Koninklijke Bam Groep N.v.
Overall, I would rate vSphere as a perfect ten out of ten.
View full review »I would absolutely recommend this solution. It's better than Microsoft Hyper-V. Hyper-V has some problems. VMware vSphere is the industry leader by far when it comes to the hypervisor sector.
Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of nine.
View full review »If you are not already virtualizing, existing-wise, you are doing yourself a severe disservice. Anybody who is continuing down the road of physical servers, any justifications that they think they have, should be challenged. If you have an environment that is all physical servers, a very easy win would be to present virtualization and denser workloads to your management. That would definitely make you look good in your career. I really don't see any negatives to moving to virtualization, even at a 100-percent adoption rate. We have yet to find a workload that is unable to run successfully in a virtualized manner, with the proper configurations and tuning.
We have not quite adopted vSphere 6.5 or 6.7. We do have some locations that have 6.5. On the radar will be utilizing the encryption capabilities, but as of yet, we have not really implemented that. We have a large organization so we move at a little bit of a slower pace. But implementing that is on the very near horizon, at least for our external-facing systems, as well as some internal.
We are also investigating the VMware Cloud on AWS initiative. That will probably be in the 2019 forum for dabbling or moving a percentage. With our being a manufacturing company, we move a little bit slower in adopting newer technologies and we have not really built the framework for a cloud initiative yet, but that will be something we investigate shortly.
I would definitely rate vSphere a 10. If you rate the Hypervisor alone, it's a 10. It has been one of the staples of technology for the last 15 years, and the key player for virtualization, for the whole industry during that time - or since Dell spun VMware off, or created the organization. It has been the premium, platinum product for Hypervisor. There are a few other players in the industry, but they are nipping at the heels, and that's about it. I do think that VMware is going to continue to lead, as far as Hypervisor goes, for the foreseeable future.
View full review »MC
Martin Coloumbe
IT Solution Architect at KnowledgeOne
If someone is starting new with VMware, it is important that you either onboard someone who has experience with it or you ramp up the knowledge of your IT operations staff. It is far-reaching and complex and requires a good understanding to manage it properly. If you don't have a good understanding at the beginning, you could find yourself in situations where you're not getting the actual return on the solution because you're not managing it properly. The knowledge gap at the beginning has to be covered quite thoroughly.
I would rate VMware vSphere an eight out of ten.
View full review »My advice to those considering VMware vSphere would be to carefully assess your business's size and the product's value proposition. It may not be well-suited for smaller enterprises due to its prohibitive cost. It's important to consider alternative solutions. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.
View full review »In instances where organizations operate on robust infrastructures and budget constraints are not a significant concern, my usual recommendation is VMware. This is especially true for financial companies that prioritize investing in and managing critical software solutions without financial constraints. Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.
View full review »I recommend VMware vSphere and rate it an eight out of ten.
View full review »I rate VMware a nine out of ten. VMware is fine. If someone has an office and they only need two or three servers, then I would recommend Hyper-V because they have a free instance for up to four servers. My recommendation would depend on someone's environment and budget, and totally depends on the size of their organization and server.
View full review »RK
Rangga Kusuma
Head Tim Infrastructure, and IT Security at Lembaga Penjamin SImpanan
I would recommend this solution to others. I advise those wanting to use the solution to test it out and compare it to competitors.
I rate VMware vSphere a nine out of ten.
View full review »SK
reviewer1451847
Sr. Systems Engineer at a non-profit with 501-1,000 employees
It's important to do your homework and make sure that it's the right solution for you. It's the same with anything, there are other options out there and you need to figure out what fits your business use case at the time.
I would rate this solution an eight out of 10.
View full review »
In fact, individuals can explore these solutions firsthand since nearly all virtual environment products offer trial periods. For instance, I personally experimented with alternative virtual environments before ultimately opting for VMware. I would rate it nine out of ten.
View full review »FK
Francis KACOU
Head of Service and Storage Infrastructure at GS2E
I'll say that if you want the vSphere solution for all virtualization, you should first look at the size of your infrastructure. If it is small, you don't have to go to, as I previously stated, Hyper-V or another solution. However, if you are starting with a medium or large size, you should use a solution like VMware because its performance is very strong. And, because we have a large infrastructure, we can see that it works very well. This is my advice to anyone looking for server virtualization software.
I would rate VMware vSphere a seven out of ten. It has been difficult for me to find a VMware engineer to work on my project. They don't seem to be very close to the customers, in my opinion. That is the main reason I gave this score of seven out of ten.
View full review »FL
reviewer1578723
IT Supervisor at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees
I rate VMware vSphere nine out of 10.
View full review »MA
Mohamed_Ashraf
Senior Product Specialist at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees
I don't need to give any advice - this product sells itself.
My recommendation to anyone considering VMware vSphere is that if you need to virtualize your environment, you will buy this solution for sure. But you have to have the servers before buying the license. You can first install it for free on a demo, or you can get the virtual environment to try the solution. But it doesn't need any advice, it is quite simple.
After working on this solution, I have joined the official course for vSphere and I took the certificate, so it allowed me to know all the features in this product.
On a scale of one to ten, not to be extreme, but I would give VMware vSphere a nine.
View full review »I would recommend this solution any day. I would rate VMware vSphere a nine out of 10. It is excellent.
View full review »JH
Jason Hong-Turney
Lead IT Systems Engineer at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees
We don't use any of the built-in security features but I do appreciate that vSphere 6.7 is inherently more secure in that it's limited, by default, to using TLS 1.2.
I would rate the solution to be a nine (out of ten) but I think they're steadily creeping towards a ten with some of the post-GA releases I've seen.
View full review »SP
Stephen Parker
Systems Engineer at BYU Idaho
Anybody who's looking to research this, to upgrade in the future, should go for it. It's a very easy upgrade. The features are very beneficial. It's very worth the time to update. It's a much easier solution for the future, and it's a better experience for all involved.
Regarding using VMware Cloud on AWS, we use AWS right now, but for our backup solutions, is all. Cold backup, long-term storage out to the cloud, is all we do right now.
For us, the biggest criteria for selecting a vendor, right now, are the pricing and the support. Because we are higher education, we have to find the best price, and support comes right behind that. We need the best support as well.
I would rate the solution as about a nine out of ten right now. It could be better but it's very close to perfect right now.
View full review »KW
Kevin Williams
IT Analyst I at Los Rios Community College District
Plan your environment well, determine what your needs are, and then try to bump that up by 20 percent; give yourself a little bit of future expanding. That way you don't have to leap off and buy a lot right away. Budget for the future if you can. Put a little bit away here and there. Look at the virtual storage, you will save yourself a lot of headaches on configuring. The physical storage can be a pain. The virtual storage, once you get it in place then you don't have to manage it much.
Make sure that you really have spec'd out your ESXi host so it can support your environment. Normally, that's been fairly easy. Companies like HPE and Lenovo are more than eager to help you make sure that you have a server that is spec'd out for the VMware environment, and help you get solid on what you need.
We haven't done a lot with the built-in security and encryption yet, but from what I've been looking at so far in vSphere 6.7, it looks like something that we would like to integrate. Before I became an analyst I helped manage TPM and BitLocker on laptops. It was a pain. It had to touch each device physically. I'm looking forward to 6.7 where I can utilize TPM 2.0 and encrypt all of my stations on the fly, and make it a more seamless experience.
We are not using VMware Cloud on AWS. Being just a local community college, it's a little bit expensive for us right now, but one day we would like to.
The product is a good, solid nine out of 10. The only reason I would knock it down any is, as I said, I wish the error messages would, at times, be a little bit more verbose and more explainable.
View full review »MH
Michael Huset
Senior Systems Administrator at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees
My advice is "do it".
I rate vSphere at nine out of 10 because the HTML version of things needs to get a little bit better. The vSphere side of things gets a little difficult to manage; right-click, in some browsers, doesn't work as well as it used to. I'm seeing a little bit of general latency that we didn't used to get with the thick client. It's getting there.
Version 6.71 brought some of those performance metrics back, but it's just hard to get from one end to the other. With the ever-changing federal requirements, we need to really strip down and minimize what can be done in the browsers. It is getting more and more difficult, Java being the key thing. Going to HTML 5, that's a great thing because Java is going to be pay-to-play next year. And you don't have the vulnerabilities with HTML 5. It works symbiotically. We're seeing that progress. There are some growing pains, but it's getting there.
View full review »Install it in a test lab first if the experience level is low for VMware solutions.
View full review »VMware vSphere has helped us provide better services to our customers because we were able to provide them with stable service. The availability of our systems increased by using VMware products. The solution's security was adequate, but we were not using it extensively.
The solution's High Availability is definitely the factor that comes into the picture because you cannot have downtime in today's IT world. VMware becomes a core strength of the product. It gives you the required availability, scalability, and stability for the environment.
I have always been looking for a seamless cloud migration strategy, which has already been implemented. Now, you can easily migrate systems from on-premises to AWS or Azure cloud. It is easy to integrate VMware vSphere with other products.
Many people using the infrastructure on-premise sometimes want to use the additional capacity in the cloud for additional functionality. The version I used earlier did not have the functionality to move the server from on-premises to the cloud seamlessly. In the newer version, they already have established that part.
Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
I'd rate the solution at a ten out of ten.
I'd recommend the solution. Most people cannnot ignore VMware unless they are looking for something very, very, very, very minimal. It's best in class.
View full review »SK
SenthilKumarGM
System Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
My advice to small to large-scale enterprises companies wanting to move to virtualization, vSphere is highly recommended for effective cost savings. The future is in virtualization, the industries are moving in that direction. Everything is in virtualization, such as networks, storage, and desktop applications. We can reduce the data center space, power cooling, and hardware lifecycle. However, the licensing costs are expensive.
I rate VMware vSphere a nine out of ten.
View full review »CB
reviewer939042
Chief Technology Officer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
The best advice I could give somebody looking to implement the solution is definitely to download the trial because you can try it out for free. Put it on some test equipment and run it and you're going to love it.
We don't have a customer that uses VMware Cloud on AWS, but we've been very involved in hoping the price gets cheaper so we can sell it.
View full review »BM
Brandon Morris
System Administrator at City of Sioux Falls
As an overall solution, I'd probably give it a nine out of ten. It is very rock solid in everything that it does and it simply works with everything, and it does a pretty darn good job doing it.
View full review »TL
Tommy-Li
Manager for Middleware at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
VMware vSphere saved us a lot of costs and easily deployed the server from templates. We use the solution to make capacity changes, increase the memory, and increase the CPU. The reason we use VMware vSphere is its high availability feature.
VMware vSphere integrates well with our existing IT security measures. We have all the agents on the VM and a central console for the security, patching for the security, and monitoring. My team has less than 1,000 VMs, and we have three resources working to support their virtualization.
I would recommend VMware vSphere to other users because it is the best virtualization solution in the market. From what I know, most companies use VMware vSphere.
Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
MO
Michael Ogunlade
Head of enterprise systems at Fidelity Bank Plc
I would rate this solution at 9, on a scale from one to ten.
View full review »NP
Nitin Pande
Associate Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
If you want 100% utilization of your hardware, you should definitely use it. There is also network virtualization and storage virtualization, but it would be quite cheaper if you go for physical storage.
If you are a medium to large organization, the hybrid environment is also there. If you are a small organization, you should go for the cloud because if your utilization is not much, it is always recommended to go for the cloud. Otherwise, go for VMware virtualization. It is 100% useful for an organization.
VMware is bringing a lot of features. They are quite ahead in terms of features. They have containerization, monitoring, operational manager, and all required features. vSAN and storage utilization are also there. They are bundling everything. Their Research and Development is very good.
I would rate VMware vSphere a nine out of ten.
View full review »LA
Luis Arencibia
IT Operations Services Manager at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
I would definitely recommend the product.
View full review »For anyone looking to implement VMware, don't take the initial implementation lightly, and don't cheapen up on the hardware, especially the storage. You will save a ton of headaches by investing in good storage that would be adequate for at least three years.
Also, do your homework on best practices, and how to implement things. It is very easy to get things working and it is more difficult to get things working smoothly. Never had I thought that I had to get familiar with the deep workings of disks, and IOPs, read and write/s ... but these are really necessary if a good implementation is the goal.
View full review »We use the solution internally and externally. We have different virtualization platforms. VMware is a mature solution. It's stable but a bit pricey. It doesn't have any competition. If we compare it to the full solution stack, it's a very mature solution. Overall, I rate the product a seven out of ten.
I rate VMware vSphere nine out of 10. It does what we need it to do, and works fine. There aren't any additional features that we need at this time.
View full review »MK
Michael-Kierum
Principal Consultant at Absolute Precision
For now, I would go with VMware for the Windows and Linux environment and do Kubernetes as a new island in the chain for containers. For most organizations, the ideal is the number of other users of a solution, because they're the ones that find the problems before you. Going off into some experimental environment may sound great and you might have a good initial experience, but if you're going to be the only person walking the minefield, it may not be a good ending.
I rate VMware nine out of 10.
View full review »EF
Emmanuel FOMUDE
Senior Oracle Database Administrator at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
VMware vSphere is user-friendly and easy to implement, so I will recommend it. I would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten.
View full review »TM
reviewer1505493
Systems Engineer at a educational organization with 11-50 employees
We're just customers and end-users.
I would recommend the solution to other organizations, so long as they've got the money. If you don't have the money you probably want to look at things that are open source. It's not a one size fits all kind of product. I say this because of the licenses. The amount of money you spend on licenses annually might be less somewhere else. For a medium enterprise, if you want a cross-platform sort of initial hypervisor I would say yes, VMware is a good option. Of course, there's always something better than VMware as well. For example, Nutanix is way ahead if you are a big enterprise.
Overall, I would rate the solution at a nine out of ten. If it was less expensive, it would basically be perfect.
View full review »ID
Irad Dukad
IT Manager at ducart
I'd recommend the solution to other users and companies.
Overall, I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten. I would say that we are quite happy with its capabilities overall.
View full review »LS
Leonardo Shewchenko
Information Technology Support Coordinator at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
I recommend that they get familiar with the technology and also with the documentation for implementation. It's really complete. I would also recommend that they obtain the training available online, which is really good.
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate this solution at ten.
View full review »JH
SeniorSyb3f0
Senior Systems Administrator at a consultancy with 5,001-10,000 employees
I have recommended VMware over the at least 12 years now that I've been working directly with them and VMware's hypervisor products. I've recommended it to a lot of folks, and this goes back to the days when other players were involved; companies like Virtual Iron and Zen. VMware has always been a leader in that space and I foresee that they always will be.
Although I work in government, we are actively pursuing VMware on Cloud and we are awaiting certain certifications to help drive the initiative. At the moment we're at a standstill with that.
In over a decade, from where we started until where we are today, I would say that this solution is right around a 10 out of 10. And I can confidently say that for any customer. Even for those who are just starting up, you're working with a product that's tried and true. It didn't just come out yesterday. It's been here for a very long time.
View full review »Without explicitly saying look at VMWare, understand what functions you need in your products, look at different vendors and what they claim to provide, and then bring them in house to see if they deliver on their claims. They have to pass all of the tests that your company needs.
We are also using NSX and vSAN. We have been using NSX for three years.
It's not strictly a cloud solution; it can be on-premises as well as in the cloud. It is, in essence, a network virtualization solution. It can be used for virtualizing the network, virtual routers, virtual switches, and virtual firewalls.
Virtualization and on-demand networking are two of the benefits. On-demand networking is the best option if I can memorize it. If you need virtual switches, we can create them as well as routers.
Virtualization would be our area of expertise.
VMware vSphere is, in my opinion, one of the best in its class on the market. However, depending on the use cases, we could certainly recommend it.
I would rate VMware vSphere a nine out of ten.
View full review »We're using version seven or thereabouts.
I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.
I would recommend it to other users and companies.
View full review »MS
reviewer1261665
VMware Software Engineer at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Up until now, we use the product on-premises, however, currently, we are developing a hybrid cloud. We are moving to the cloud solution and the base, the transition system is, VMware vSphere.
While we use the solution's 6.7 version, the latest version is version 7.
I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. I've been very happy with the capabilities of the product.
I would recommend the solution to other users and organizations.
View full review »SS
Sid Sharma
Lead QA Analyst at Loomis Express
I do not prefer the newest version because of the bulk that it adds to ThinApp, especially with Windows 10 operating system. If they can find a way around that, it would be really good.
Considering the returns and the number of users for the ThinApps that we create using vSphere, I would rate VMware vSphere a nine out of 10.
View full review »I rate VMware vSphere an eight out of ten.
View full review »VMware vSphere helps with large scale deployments and maintenance. On a scale from one to ten, I would rate it at nine.
View full review »RB
RavindraBhojwani
Logistics and product Manager at a security firm with 11-50 employees
On a scale from one to ten, I would give VMware vSphere a ten.
View full review »AT
Allan Trambouze
Senior Consultant at Cofomo
Think about your business needs, afterwards choose the product. Write down your needs on paper in bullets, then the solution will be clear and you can justify choosing VMware, not Hyper-V.
I would rate this solution as a nine out of 10. There is always space for improvement.
Most important criteria when selecting a vendor: It depends on the business's need. That is all. I am a consultant and must know what my client needs. If they want a Rolls Royce, I give them a Rolls Royce. If they want a Honda Civic, I give them a Honda Civic. I must know the products to fit them to the customer's needs. I don't sell too much, just what the customer wants.
View full review »DP
Daniel Pietrasanta
IT Systems Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Analyze your infrastructure first, see what you want to do, and then start deploying everything from zero.
View full review »PG
reviewer924948
Senior Manager Systems/Network, Global Information Systems at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
- Look at the market and see what is supportable. How long can you support the product. VMware has the history. It has the people who can support it in the industry.
- Look at the supportability of it. Look at the job market and how many people, from a staffing perspective, can support it.
- Then, look at the cost, because I don't think cost is everything.
Most important criteria when selecting a vendor: They are a leader and more innovative than the competitors.
View full review »CW
reviewer924351
Director, Windows Server Infrastructure at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
If you're not already looking at vSphere, you're probably behind. I don't really have any colleagues who aren't utilizing this product.
I rate this solution as a nine out of 10 because I think you can always improve. But it's a tremendous product. We consider VMware a partner, we work with them closely.
View full review »
Plan, plan, plan. Always plan out your network changes, test those changes, implement, monitor, and note take along the way. Aside from that, do it.
View full review »
I can recommend this solution. I would rate it at least an eight out of 10.
MM
MinaMagdy
Senior Infrastructure Solutions Specialist at Fiber Misr
I rate this solution a nine out of 10.
View full review »TR
Tony Reeves
Network Administrator
We do not currently use VMware Cloud on AWS.
If I had to rate vSphere from one to ten - version 6.7 - I would say right now it's probably about a ten.
View full review »JK
DesktopS0c59
Desktop Support Supervisor at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
It is quick to learn, it's not overly complicated. You don't have to spend a lot of time learning about it, at least from the usability perspective, once it has been set up, of course. It's really easy to use, easy to set up, easy to find what you're looking for, easy to manage.
When selecting a vendor to work with, our biggest issue would be availability. We've had some issues with some vendors in the past where they were just too small. Being in Des Moines, we don't have a lot of options, other than bringing people in from other states, or even other countries, possibly. If we do have something come up - which, luckily, we really haven't had anything too bad - just having that immediate connection and resolution is important.
This solution has to be a ten out of ten. It's been great. It's easy to use, it's laid out very well, so it's easy to onboard.
View full review »PY
reviewer1158117
Assistant Consultant with 10,001+ employees
We are with one of the service providers. I'm managing VMware.
We are not working with the latest version of the solution. We're working with, for example, N-1.
I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. We are very happy with its capabilities and don't have anything negative to say.
View full review »MK
MUKUNDKULKARNI
IT Manager at KIRLOSKAR PNEUMATIC CO. LTD.
It's quite stable, has good support available, and is a mature product.
I rate VMware vSphere a nine out of ten.
View full review »MF
Mohamed Fathi
IT Manager at pioneers
I would recommend this solution to others.
I rate VMware vSphere an eight out of ten.
View full review »YS
Yves-Schatzmann
Senior Information Technology Consultant at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees
We consider the solution to be obligatory.
The solution's use can range from ten users to thousands.
I would definitely recommend the solution to others. I am a big fan of it.
I rate VMware vSphere as a twenty out of ten. I give it a perfect ten rating.
FW
ForrestWu
Sr. Manager IT at a non-profit with 51-200 employees
For my friend with stock in virtualization, I think maybe they can try the Cloud. That may be easier, and they don't need to stay on-premises.
On a scale from one to ten, I would give VMware vSphere a nine.
View full review »IS
Igor Schwarz
Presales Engineer at Emet Computing
In summary, this is a good product and I recommend it.
If you have a mixed environment that includes Windows, Linux, and other operating systems then this product is a good choice. However, if you have a purely Linux environment, such as Red Hat, then you can save money and have better performance by implementing KVM instead.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
View full review »RV
Rene Van Den Beden
Chief Architect at RoundTower Technologies
Partner with the right partner because not all partners are the same. And have a strategy in mind. Have a design in place, the logical design. What functions are you trying to achieve? What business problems are you trying to solve? And then go ahead and do your due diligence with testing, etc. Once you involve the partner and you're implementing, make sure you have proper testing, have a soft launch, and then a go-live, so that you've got a risk-free solution.
That's where a lot of customers go wrong. They don't do their due diligence, and they don't properly launch, and they have the wrong partner that they partnered with, who is not quite up to the task of doing this type of thing.
For our customers that are very security conscious, in the financial space and the healthcare space, they typically will have clusters where TPM and virtual machine encryption are enabled to provide a more secure experience for those services.
We sell a lot of VMware Cloud on AWS. It integrates natively through hybrid cloud extensibility into VMC on AWS. That's actually been a big selling point with 6.7.
I rate the solution at nine out of ten. What would bring it up to a ten is feature-parity with the HTML5 interface.
View full review »SC
Sean Crawford
Information Systems Analyst at San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG)
We do use AWS, but not for VMware Cloud on AWS. We only use it for storage.
I'd give vSphere a nine out of ten. The only reason I give it a nine is because VMware has amped up how frequently they release new versions and that adds instability to a stable environment. But other than that, I would've given it a ten.
View full review »MJ
Mikael Korsgaard Jensen
Sr. Operations Engineer at Kamstrup
My advice would be just get started as soon as possible.
At the moment, we are not using VMware Cloud on AWS, but that's because we're still trying to get ahold of legislation because of GDPR.
If I had to rate the product from one to ten, I would rate it at a nine. What could they do to bring it to a ten? In my opinion, it would be alignment with other products, and a more automated upgrade, where you take the other products into account, so you can upgrade the entire VMware stack from a single interface.
CH
Infrastr7d14
Infrastructure with 5,001-10,000 employees
In term of advice, obviously some of the SSL stuff would be good to know upfront because the requesting of the certificates, while it's gotten easier, can still be a little bit tricky. There are so many of them that you need. Knowing the right steps for selecting what you need can be challenging.
We're not using VM encryption, support for TPM or VBS right now, but we're looking at implementing some of that stuff to improve our security stance.
We're slowly attempting to push our database administrators into moving into VMware. They're reluctant, of course, but we have not given them much of a choice. They will come along and we just need to make sure that they're comfortable and we get them fully supported and happy.
I would easily rate the solution a nine out of 10. The little problems I have with it here and there notwithstanding, it's the easiest product I have ever had to use for something as complex as your entire infrastructure being in one area. I have dabbled around with other products and they never seem to quite be at the same level of stability and feature sets.
View full review »I would rate this solution at around nine out of 10. There are ups and downs, but essentially it is an excellent solution.
My advice: Just go for it. At this point, I have had a lot of experience with competing products, but in terms of finish, in terms of flexibility, in terms of user-friendliness again, I would say vSphere, in my book, is still about as good as a solution can be. They are near the top. There is always room for improvement, but they are in front of the pack.
View full review »The core hypervisor is decent. Many issues will be with management and bolt-on products.
View full review »vSphere is great, I’ve made a career of it.
View full review »I’d grab the software from their site - you can deploy it and use it for 60 days free of charge, so whether you’re doing a large or small deployment try it out and see if it works. You can also engage with technical support services. The software is free, so grab it and play with it.
View full review »NT
reviewer1119762
Information Technology Security Specialist at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. We've been satisfied with its general capabilities so far.
View full review »PM
PrasadMane
System Advisor IT at CRIF India
The freelance experience for the platform is excellent.
I would recommend this solution to other users.
I would rate VMware vSphere a ten out of ten.
View full review »GP
Gabriele-Pizzigati
Senior Software and Systems Engineer at SAMU.IT
The vSphere serves as the system's control center for managing virtual machines (VMs). VMware vSphere is present in all installations.
Our solutions are all deployed on-premises.
As a company, we advise, supply, and install products for our clients. We provide two solutions, one of which is Sangfor and the other is VMware.
As a reseller of vSphere, I would recommend this solution to anyone who is interested in using it.
I would rate VMware vSphere an eight out of ten.
View full review »EN
reviewer1602309
IT Manager at a legal firm with 51-200 employees
We're just customers and end-users. We don't have any business relationship with VMware.
We use the latest version of the solution. I can't speak to the exact version number.
We're very happy with the solution overall. I'd rate it at a nine out of ten.
Using this product is a no-brainer. It's a really easy product to use. If you're looking at simply a VM or anything similar or anything cloud-based, it's pretty much exactly what you need.
View full review »KR
กฤษฎา รวยเรืองรุ่ง
System Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
I would give vSphere 9 out of 10, as it is easy to use, and there is good support available.
View full review »For new users, virtual appliance is the best choose as it is saving costs and is much easier to set it up as well.
View full review »VMware is not as proactive. They’re not willing to correct some problems I've faced. So VMware should be a bit more flexible in their engineering. I always tell them that with the architecture I've put in place, I can’t use SRM at all, but whatever SRM does, I can do manually, yet I can’t automate it.
Everything is going in the right track so I would ultimately recommend the product. Peer reviews are 10/10 – extremely important.
View full review »WM
Walid Mouamar
Network and Security Engineer at a logistics company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I can recommend vSphere without hesitation. I would rate it an eight out of ten.
View full review »MA
reviewer1232400
Infrastructure Senior Specialist at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
VMware vSphere are leaders in virtualization. The capital investment is high, but it is efficient.
I would rate it a ten out of ten.
View full review »We are currently in the process of moving to version 7 of the solution.
I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We've been mostly quite satisfied with the solution overall. I'd recommend it to other companies.
View full review »JD
Jeroen De Jonge
Autodidact Quantum Physics- Quantum mechanics. at IC Consultancy
I would rate vSphere and 9.5 out of ten.
I really like it because it's a storage restoration additional add-on but it's really expensive now.
View full review »GS
Ganesh Sekarbabu
Windows Virtualization Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
I would rate vSphere as a nine out of 10.
I will recommend the solution, but there are some steps to take first. There are some VMware videos to view and some KB articles to read, which are available, regarding compatibility. I would recommend them to go through everything. Go through the KB articles, then I will recommend them to implement that one.
An important criteria for choosing a vendor is evaluating how a company behaves. We will review their past history, the current market, and the value of that product. Then, we will see whether that product can used for our requirement. Based on that, we choose our vendors.
We haven't started using the VM encryption. We are in the very initial stage, doing a PoC for it and also the UEFI Secure Boot. These are options that we are trying. Let's see how they will work, and we're looking forward to their results.
View full review »DG
David Grimes
VP of Product Engineering at Navisite
If I had to give a rating of one to ten for vSphere, I would give it a nine. No software nor hardware is perfect, but vSphere is good. That's why I would say a nine. There is still some room for improvement, like larger FTVMs, continued evolution, and keeping pace with the scalability of underlying physical infrastructure.
For somebody looking to evaluate a virtualization platform such as vSphere or any of its competing open source solutions, like KVM or other virtualization platforms, one of the key considerations is to look at TCO. vSphere may seem expensive upfront, and there may be some sticker shock there, but if you look at it over the long-term and from a human capital perspective to operate the platform over a period of three or more years, the manageability of vSphere drives the total cost of ownership way down.
View full review »The best advice I could give is spend a lot of time designing your environment to receive VMware. Read everything you can get your hands on, and take a good online course or attend one in a city near you. Be aware that you will need to know a lot about computers, storage, networking, and security environments to determine the best design for you.
Download the latest ESXi version and build a test lab. You get 60 days to play with the full gambit of features. Then get a lot of advice from vendor specific engineers, HP, EMC, Netapp, Cisco, etc. because the hardware you choose will run into configuration issues specific to the vendors you choose to use in your environment. Don't go into this thinking you will see immediate returns on your investment. This is a long term design decision.
View full review »Even with no reporting, it's near perfect, because reporting would just make things easier, and not having it doesn’t impede performance.
View full review »Have a plan for system virtualization before pursuing vSphere. Often, the actual needs of an organization, particularly small and medium sized, are overestimated which leads to spending more for a product or product license than is necessary.
View full review »WK
reviewer1390341
IT Infrastructure Engineer at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees
It is a very fine and reliable solution. I would rate it a nine out of 10.
View full review »BA
Bilal Aslam
Founder & Technology Advisor at EUC Solutions
In Pakistan, for the most part, organizations are still catching up in terms of the cloud. There are no large data centers because cloud providers do not exist locally. Neither AWS nor Azure has a presence.
The closest data centers to us are Singapore and Dubai. As such, the cloud is not very popular yet and most of our customers have on-premises deployments. We do expect this to change.
My advice for anybody who is implementing this product, or any piece of software, is to have a reasonable level of knowledge in advance of the deployment. That is key in IT.
If you are a consultant, as opposed to an end-user, then you need to have a deep knowledge of the product because there are circumstances where you have to go beyond the normal configuration. Sometimes you have issues that can only be resolved if you are well-equipped with the knowledge.
I also recommend that people plan their deployment. VMware is a wonderful product and it will definitely provide you with the functionality to meet your technical requirements. You will be a very satisfied customer while using it, but the key is to know the product and plan things properly.
Overall, this is a good product and I do not feel that there is much missing. It is the best virtualization platform available.
I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.
View full review »GF
reviewer1681332
IT Operations Support at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees
I would rate VMware vSphere a nine out of ten.
View full review »DF
Domingos Francisco
IT Administrator at a healthcare company with 201-500 employees
My advice to those wanting to implement the solution is to make sure they read and know exactly what the solution does, and if there were updates from the previous version they have used, understand the changes before implementing.
I rate VMware vSphere a nine out of ten.
View full review »MD
Madhura Direckze
Technical Account Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
I would recommend this solution to others. If you use VMware, then you need to use vSphere to manage the clusters.
I rate VMware vSphere a nine out of ten.
View full review »KC
Karthikeyan Chinnadurai
Solutions Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Overall, for me, everything with this product looks good and I can recommend it.
I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.
View full review »OK
OmidKoushki
Solution Architect at KIAN company
I recommend this solution to most of my customers because it is very stable, and it has a lot of good features. In comparison to other solutions, I prefer to use VMware. I also recommend Hyper-V, but VMware vSphere is my first choice.
I would rate VMware vSphere an eight out of ten.
View full review »AP
reviewer1266792
IT Infrastructure Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
It's important to contract a good level of support from VMware.
I would rate VMware vSphere a nine out of ten.
View full review »TN
Trevor Napier
System Administrator at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would rate it at a nine, because I don't believe any type of technology is a ten. There is always room for improvement. However, this is a solid nine.
Spend time researching, investing, and testing for months. Spend a few months testing the product before implementing it to production.
I don't have too much experience with the encryption or secure features of the new vSphere version.
View full review »RC
Robert Cox
Systems Engineer at Vestmark inc
Take your time to do the appropriate research and planning, so that it's sized appropriately. A lot of issues that I've seen are from either underlying hardware or resource constraints that aren't necessarily related to vSphere or VMware, rather that things weren't implemented appropriately.
We do not you use VMware Cloud on AWS. Right now we just have on-prem for both production and DR. We are starting to move some small Dev environments to AWS. I haven't been a part of that project. From what I hear, there have been some ups and downs but, for the most part, I believe there has been positive feedback.
I would rate vSphere a nine out of ten. Ten means everything is perfect. As much as everyone tries to strive for that goal, it's unattainable because there are just so many moving parts, hardware, software, user input, end-users. It's the best that it can be in a nonperfect world.
View full review »AA
Ayodeji Ariyo
Senior Network Engineer with 1,001-5,000 employees
If you're not on vSphere, you should get on it as soon as possible because it will only make your life easier. All the different innovations that have been coming out over the years have shown that it's only going to get better, especially with artificial intelligence, IoT, etc. With all the different technologies that are being proposed, VMware is always going to get better. From a technology standpoint, anybody who is in the industry needs to be on this because it just makes everything easier.
We have been using the built-in security features such VM Encryptions and support for TPM and VBS, and it has been hit or miss for us. In some instances we've used it and in some instances we haven't. But for the most part, I think it's okay.
We have started using some cloud technologies with it, partnering with AWS to do that. We have a couple of internet-facing applications that we have used, that we have deployed to the cloud, and the experience has been somewhat okay.
Because of the nature of our business, there is an apprehension toward actually putting information out on the cloud, if it's not a private cloud. So the latter is what we have chosen to do. We have been able to deploy applications into our own private cloud space, with dedicated pipes to the cloud, with firewalls on both sides of it. We do AD Federation Services to authenticate between the cloud space and our internal network, and we have domain controllers in the cloud as well. We have gone through the growing pains of going to the cloud and now we're working through the quirks and nuisances that come along with that.
View full review »RE
Raden Evangelista
Systems Engineerineering Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 51-200 employees
Go for it. It's easy to use and manage.
Most important criteria when selecting a vendor: support.
View full review »PR
Patrick Ringelberg
Owner at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Look at the total product – if you’re comparing it to Citrix and Microsoft, look at all the features VMWare is hosting in your product and make a comparison. Also, understand your plans – what do you want to do, what’s your vision, and how does it match what you’re looking to buy?
View full review »VL
Thang Le Toan (Victory Lee)
CIO at Robusta Technology & Training
- VMware vSphere 5.5 should be invested in for virtualization infrastructure as it is cheap, effective, and stable. It also meets more requirements than other products.
- Investment decisions VDI technology did its review on the actual needs for each person/group/ department needs and had professional software for it and they decided to use VDI.
- In the process of deploying VDI, the application should be virtualized, shared services should be enhanced, and limited desktop virtual machines for the particular user.s (e.g. design engineers need 3D GPU rendering, chief accountant, architect, system administration).
- The following should be studied and then implemented - SSO configuration, GPO, security methods, ACL permissions, firewall, anti-virus for servers and virtual desktops in a consistent manner, all in accordance with ISO 27000.
We can customize everything from UI of cloud to the supply of integration vApp
View full review »Overall, I rate VMware vSphere an eight out of ten.
View full review »vSphere 6.5 has been a great release with the vCenter Appliance and will only get better in the next release with the HTML5 client becoming 100% in parity to the flash client.
View full review »I am a consultant and reseller.
My advice to others who are considering implementing the solution is they have a good partner.
I rate VMware vSphere as a seven out of ten.
View full review »SM
SandeepMenon
Manager at SSMS
We are using the latest version of the solution at this point. I cannot speak to the exact version number off-hand.
We are not integrating the solution at this time.
I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. I would recommend the solution to other companies.
View full review »GC
reviewer1346730
IT Director at a manufacturing company with 201-500 employees
We don't have a business relationship with the product. We're just customers.
If we speak about version five or plus five, I'm pretty knowledgeable about those as I was a network administrator back then. However, version six, version seven, I deal with these versions maybe two times per year, so I'm not very good on them.
Overall, I'd rate them at an eight out of ten, mostly due to the high pricing and container management.
View full review »SK
Stephen Krujelskis
Senior System Administrator at a university with 501-1,000 employees
Aim for simple, go for fewer hosts with bigger resources, depending of course of on what you need. Don't try to do everything at once. Start with a basic setup and work up from there.
We did not really see a performance boost with version 6.5.
Regarding the most important criteria when selecting a vendor, it needs to be an industry-leading solution, needs to be easy, simple to set up, not an entire ecosystem of things that I need to deploy to get their system working. Ideally, I want something that we can set up in a day.
I'd give vSphere about a nine out of ten. There is still stuff to work on, but it's definitely the best for me. As I said, I find that the support never blows me away, and maybe that's because I don't pay for the most premium level of support, but I find that what we got on the last few tickets that we opened was not great.
View full review »PL
Preston Lasebikan
Lead Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
In terms of advice, especially if you are on things like Hyper-V or other products that I've touched, the simplicity and scalability of the vSphere product has been solid. For another individual who is in the IT or engineering fields, I wouldn't go with anything else.
One thing a lot of people don't realize or know about is that Xcode and OS X are closely tied to the versioning of vSphere and what features will be enabled. Coming out this September is MacOS 10.14 and that brings with it the need and requirement to run APFS, which is only supported in 6.7. So we have an abundance of customers, all of which are iOS developers, who require 6.7. So having that coming out was a major need and requirement for us.
I haven't noticed a direct performance boost, but the performance is no less than it was in 6.5, which is always generally a good thing. With the addition of features, nothing slowed down, everything is still exactly where it was.
RP
Rob Pease
IT Director at Jewish Family Service
In terms of advice to a colleague, I'm giving it every day. I take the guy out to lunch to beat him up with vSphere. I've got a buddy who is a Hyper-V guy. He's says, "But it's free," and I keep saying, "Well, you get what you pay for." He says, "But it never gives me any problems." I say, "Then why are you calling me every week asking me why Exchange is doing stupid things? I don't have those problems and I run exactly the same version you do."
It's stable. It just works. I don't have to think about it.
Some of the new stuff that's coming out is pretty exciting, as we start thinking of moving to the cloud. But, as a non-profit, at this point, it doesn't make sense to do so, yet. But as we move to the cloud, some of the new stuff they talked about yesterday, here at VMworld 2018, is really going to help us do that.
I give vSphere an eight out of ten because of the web interface. It would be a ten otherwise.
View full review »
Things to consider before purchasing VMware or Hyper-V:
• Understand your virtualization objectives and requirements before purchase. Assess all requirements against VMware or Hyper-V licensing cost and edition functionality
• Define a strategy for resource intensive applications (large CPU or memory requirements) and when to stay standalone vs. virtual
• Implement processes to control “VM sprawl” as VM provisioning process is so simple.
• Consider other process efficiencies that virtualization may drive (i.e. Service Catalog)
• Ensure IT staff gets proper training. The learning curve can be steep initially at the enterprise level.
• If possible , look at processes for show-back or charge-back model early on to assess costs and ROI.
View full review »
JS
reviewer1344021
Deputy director at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
I have two clusters, version 7 and version 6.7. Both are there.
I'm not using the cloud-based version and other stuff, so I couldn't comment on it. On the on-premises version, however, it's a very good solution. It has a nice interface and nice everything and is a very stable product. We have never faced any issues yet.
I'd recommend the solution to others 100%.
I would rate the solution at a nine out of ten.
View full review »AS
reviewer357684
Technical Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Regarding this solution, vSphere is the gold standard. It has been there for 15 years, and you're not going to find people who are dissatisfied with vSphere. You're not going to find people complaining about vSphere. The only thing you will find is when we talk about things like VxRail, things like that, where issues can come. vSphere by itself, I can't think of anybody who's not happy with it.
I would rate vSphere a ten out of ten. You're not going to find anything better.
View full review »Virtualization fulfills the requirements very well.
I would rate VMware vSphere a 10 out of 10.
View full review »RS
reviewer1502625
Delivery Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would recommend VMware vSphere to potential buyers. I will always do that. It's highly recommended to go with the entire vSphere Cloud Suite rather than only just going with the Hypervisor. But if you go with the entire suite, it's really wonderful.
On a scale of one to ten, I would rate VMware vSphere an eight.
View full review »CB
reviewer1081776
Systems Engineer/Systems Administrator at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
VMware vSphere is my preferred hypervisor. It always has been, and always will be. I suggest using it, and not hesitating. I'm sure that they're working on great stuff to enhance this product that I can't even think of, but from my perspective, everything that they do today is great. I don't know what they could possibly do to make my life easier, but I'm sure they'll come up with something.
I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.
View full review »MA
Muhammad Tanvir Ashraf
Systems and Network Administrator at Gulf Precast Concrete Co. LLC at Gulf Precast Concrete Co. LLC
When I hear that somebody is willing to deploy a similar solution, I suggest this product to them and even help with the deployment. I love this product.
Once this solution is deployed, only fine tuning needs to be done. Once complete and everything is in place, you don't have to do much. From the technical end, the product is great.
I would rate this product a ten out of ten.
View full review »LG
Luis Gomez
Server Engineer at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
Give it a shot, check it out how easy it is. It just works.
I rate it a ten out of ten. I'm a big advocate of VMware.
View full review »Do a side-by-side comparison. Try it, stay away from Microsoft. The Microsoft solution of being everything to everybody does not fit. Never fits.
Everything that we do is strictly within our own company. So we don't do encryption, although we might look at that. We don't really have a need for TPM. It's a pretty controlled environment.
I would rate vSphere an eight out of 10. To make it a 10 they need to get rid of Flash and then apologize for having used Flash, have it auto-scale, and no Java.
View full review »CT
ITAnalysac7f
IT Analyst at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
I would recommend trying the solution.
View full review »TP
Tom Pine
Lead Administrator at Comcast
I'm anxious for 7.0 to come out because I'm curious to see how the HTML will function. We keep hearing the web client will be better, and it's not. Bring back the fat client!
View full review »JJ
John_Jones
Systems Administrator at a energy/utilities company with 51-200 employees
Do your homework and build it from the ground up. Set up a plan to replace everything and get started from the beginning as a full virtualized environment. It won't bite you later, which is one thing we were worried about, and we ended up having to do extra work to do small steps into virtualization.
Most important criteria when selecting a vendor:
- Interoperability with what I currently have and its ability to work with others.
- Support.
- Price.
From my point of view, particularly in the IT industry, you need to be continually moving forward, otherwise you are moving backwards or out. But that is not to say there is no room for improvement in particular areas, for instance, in addressing products that help the small business arena. With discussions I have had with internal VMware employees, they have known this and have introduced products, like VSAN, to help address this arena.
Get buy-in from other areas within your organization, which is typically an easy sell. But do it up front and identify a relatively small test deployment and the internal level of expertise. Then fill voids with either internal training or by establishing partnerships.
This is a logical diagram of our vITA Lab environment:
Cost considerations aside, be sure to properly scale your VM environment above all else. This is true regardless of product.
View full review »You should understand what is your demand and plan your capacity and resource allocation carefully to avoid double work in the near future.
For small infrastructures, start with the free vSphere Hypervisor. For small businesses, VMware vSphere Essentials Kits are inexpensive but limited to three hosts. So be sure you are not going to grow more than this for a while if you are considering this option. For medium-sized businesses and corporations, go for it. It will greatly reduce your operating costs.
View full review »They've been able to push out little things as the management agent which allow you to work through vCenter and allow you to connect through vCenter to see all your hosts and make automation very, very easy. On top of that they give you the vCenter Applicance so you're no longer tied to a SQL license. You don't have to worry about using SQL Express and running out of space or running out of license space and then re-licensing it. Then they've also solved the upgrade path. Every time a new B, C, D, whatever version of vCenter comes out I don't know how many times the Windows version blows up. Seeing a company being able to say okay you know what? Let's take a step back. Let's use a very similar OS and let's allow you to utilize vCenter just like ESXi, it's the same platform.
Anything that solves a problem. Find out what your biggest problem is and see how VMware can help you solve that problem. There's more principle architects out there that, especially with everything that's being added to the platform, that would be people specialized specifically in things. VMware has that capacity and the capability to help you solve that problem. Getting the vendor involved, maybe not necessarily a service provider but having VMware actually evaluated. They're going to tell you what you're doing wrong.
We operate within a 10% market of people who don't use Windows. You got to find somebody out there and one of the biggest problems you'll find is you won't find MySQL documentation in terms of what people are using and how they're using it. It's this big, there's not a lot of information that people, in a private sector, are even willing to share or in the public sector. They're still trying to figure it out themselves. Finding out who's successful is pretty much who's willing to write your review. That's something I'd like to contribute in terms of what we're doing to put it out there, let other people know who come to you guys and say, "Who else is doing this?" We can't be the first people.
View full review »SS
Sukanya Satapanachai
Infrastructure Professional Service Team Lead at G-Able
This is generally a good and stable solution. It's about weighing up the cost against what the product offers for a specific use case.
I rate this solution seven out of 10.
HV
Hans-Peter Volk
Head of Professional Services at Axians ICT Austria GmbH
I would absolutely recommend using this solution. It's clear-based, straightforward, and includes all of the options required in business.
Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of ten.
View full review »SL
Stanley Lee
Principal Engineer at ST Engineering Limited
It's important to understand your requirements before choosing a solution.
I would rate this solution a seven out of 10.
View full review »SG
reviewer1441107
Owner at a transportation company with 1-10 employees
I think the decision needs to be made by the architects of the solution. They need to be aware of the cost of such solutions, their requirements, and the constraints of such technologies. From a technological point, it's always a good solution. However, it might not be the best solution in terms of the total cost of ownership, and maybe there are better solutions like Proxmox.
I would give VMware vSphere a solid eight out of ten.
View full review »BG
Blake Grover
System Admin at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
In terms of advice, I've looked at many different solutions out there and, right now, VMware is the only one that can provide all the different things that we needed it to do.
When selecting a vendor, the most important criteria would be the ease of use, the benefits it has, the features. If we were to switch to someone else, they would have to have all the different features that VMware has currently. And then, price would come in last.
I give it a nine out of ten because it has almost all the features we've needed and it's pretty much simple keeping it under control.
View full review »CH
SystemAd3999
System Administrator at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
I would recommend it highly. I have no complaints. We did a PoC with them and we have been using other products from VMware for years.
The important criteria involved in choosing it were flexibility and ease of use for our user base.
My advice, if you are going to implement it, is: Read the documentation and question the vendor carefully when doing the install.
View full review »GW
NetworkAa4a7
Network Administrator at a educational organization with 5,001-10,000 employees
I would tell colleagues to take a look at vSphere, if it makes sense for their organization. I've been working with VMware products in one way, shape, or form since the late 90s. Originally, I used it for training purposes and I wasn't even thinking about production. But I have no qualms today, if it's a production system, virtualizing it, as opposed to keeping it on hardware.
There is always a learning curve and there are also functionality differences between the clients.
For the most part, if everything is working fine, it's efficient to manage. But if you have people say, "Hey, I see performance issues," that's where it becomes a little more of a problem. That's one issue that we're trying to address right now: being able to capture more logging for longer periods of time. Perhaps we need to use a Syslog Server to be able to help troubleshoot some issues by being able to look at particular periods of time.
I rate this solution as a seven out of 10 because of the issues with the clients, especially the web client, at times. And there is also the "black box" nature of understanding what's going on when there is a problem.
View full review »Keep going guys. Best thing under the sun.
View full review »Consider alternatives like AHV before jumping in feet first.
View full review »It’s rock solid and there’s nothing in its class in terms of alternatives.
View full review »The Hardware Compatibility List (HCL) is your bible now. Read it, understand it, and do not deviate from it. If you have existing centralized storage you wish to use, it must be on the HCL. See what VAAI primitives it supports. Do not thin provision both Array Side and VMware side; pick one.
View full review »I would say from a 4 of Hyper-V, I would easily give this a 7 or 8, as the support definitely improved drastically.
When selecting a vendor, do your research and develop relationships. If you know the product and can get in contact with POCs, we want to see the product before we buy it.
JS
JeanSpiteri
Infrastructure Engineer at a hospitality company with 51-200 employees
I would rate VMware vSphere a 10 out of 10.
DL
Donald Lesotlho
IT Support Officer at a non-profit with 501-1,000 employees
We are using VMware solutions. We are running the VMware standard edition. We also have VMware vSphere and VMware ESXi.
We are running the latest version of VMware vSphere: 7.0. We started with version four of this software.
I wouldn't say that there are features that I like the most about VMware vSphere, because it's just a normal management console. It's a default client management software for the virtual environment. It's just a console that we use.
We have been using the software since we enrolled into the virtual CRR, so we are used to it. I can't say whether it's easy to use or not, because I've been using it forever. I can't do any comparison. To say it's easy to use or it's not easy to use would not suffice, because I've been using it for years, so I know how to navigate the platform. What I want to see, I can get easily from VMware vSphere.
I don't recall the last time we installed the software, and even if it was a difficult process, I wouldn't know, because that would best be answered by the technical team, who keeps installing it for different lines. For me it was something that was done once.
We only have one engineer who takes care of the deployment and maintenance of VMware vSphere. The software is only used by fewer than five people, e.g. just the administrators. We're not increasing the number of users, because there are only just a few people needed to man the environment.
I would recommend VMware vSphere to others, particularly because when I contacted them about some issues, they assisted me diligently.
From one to ten, I'm rating VMware vSphere an eight.
When you talk about performance improvement of VMware vSphere, you have to look at other factors. You look at the whole infrastructure. You can't look at the software alone, because when it comes to performance, you also have to look at your hardware. You have to look at your storage. It isn't just the software, e.g. VMware vSphere, that you are using. For example, the last time we had an issue, it wasn't only because of the VMware side. It was also because of our storage, e.g. Our storage capacity was full, so we had to engage VMware. To improve performance, the VMware infrastructure as a whole should be improved, which means changing the storage, storage accessories, etc. VMware vSphere is only connected, and it's only a software that is running on the hardware, so to improve performance, we also need to talk about and look into the hardware aspects of the solution.
View full review »RK
reviewer1173861
Global IT Infrastructure Architect at a wholesaler/distributor with 5,001-10,000 employees
In summary, this is a very stable solution and it has been that way for years. So far, it's been a very good fit. The only question is today, is it still worthwhile investing in on-premise solutions, or are cloud solutions at a level where we can move production nodes to it? That's basically our question and I'm guessing a question that a lot of other companies are asking themselves.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
UF
reviewer929742
System support engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
While we are currently using the on-premises deployment, our plan is to move completely to the cloud.
We are using the latest version of the solution at this point. I can't speak to the exact version number.
I'd rate the solution at a ten out of ten overall. It's a very useful product.
I would recommend the solution to other users or other companies.
View full review »KA
Kobus Almon
Chief Technology Officer at perfekt
The solution is mostly deployed on-premises, although we also have cloud deployments.
This product is suitable for a company of any size.
The solution rates competitively against Nutanix and Microsoft. Overall, I feel it to be a pretty proven platform, although the underlying platform, or the management and features that surround it, are of secondary importance. BDI is the main focus.
I rate VMware vSphere as an eight out of ten.
AS
reviewer1642854
Sr. Virtualization Engineer at a government with 51-200 employees
I don't find anything that I think it would be a bottleneck or any challenge. I've been using it for so many years. It's a robust product, and I don't see anything lacking. I would advise potential users to go for it. It's something you can rely on. It's very robust and doesn't break if you implement it correctly. It actually gives you peace of mind.
On a scale from one to ten, I would give VMware vSphere an eight.
View full review »RM
Rajesh Mehta
Enterprise Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We're a partner with VMware.
We are a data center service provider. We sell these services to customers. We are not using it for ourselves only. We are also selling the solution to our customers. In that sense, there's always a plan to increase vSphere.
Overall, we're pretty satisfied with the solution. I'd rate it a seven out of ten.
View full review »VA
reviewer1447761
Assitant Director - IT at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
We're just a customer. We don't have a business relationship with vSphere.
We aren't using the latest version of the solution. The near version is sufficient for us and it's solving our requirements.
Overall, I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.
While I would recommend it due to the fact that it's solving my problems, I am evaluating other products that may be better. There may be an open-source option that could also work for us. That said, this product is great in that we are using it hassle-free.
View full review »WW
Walmik Wankhede
Manager IT at a healthcare company with 201-500 employees
Before selection of any product, first determine your own requirements, study them, and then present solutions.
View full review »AB
Reviewer3064
Head - Server and Storage at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
From my side, the advice would be to design it properly the first time. Have proper capacity planned out, and don't just create over-provision in the production environment. Best you can do with provisioning with production, you definitely need to have some capacity sizing done properly. And, that goes in not for just this product but any virtualization product that a company implements. You do not want to overload the hardware. You have to think about the capabilities of the end-user.
View full review »SC
Sajag Chaturvedi
IT Infrastructure Architect at a retailer
I will rate vSphere a ten out of ten, as I'm a huge fan of vSphere.
Please look into this solution. You can have it, test it, and download it for 60 days, then you can test it yourself decide what is best for you.
We don't have VMware cloud on AWS, but we have plan to go on it in six months.
The most important thing when choosing a vendor: We look for performance, return on investment, and tech support. Tech support is very important for us in day-to-day tasks. These are the things that we look for in a vendor.
View full review »MW
CIO9dd5
CIO at a library with 201-500 employees
If you're managing more than five servers run over and get some vSpere Essentials. I think virtualization is the only way to go, whether you do it on-premise or in the cloud, nowadays. It doesn't make any sense once you get beyond a couple.
I rate the solution an eight. Price would be the main thing, as well as the relative inaccessibility for end-users to be able to touch the product.
View full review »I advise you to review your needs and then look into the features. I am sure you will get solution of your needs.
View full review »There is nothing else enterprise-ready, like they are. If you are considering similar solutions, make sure you take deep dives technically into how well they integrate with other vendors, or how well they integrate with your hardware. Like VSAN for instance, a lot of the storage vendors that are really going for it to be on the VSAN HCL, and unfortunately some of the RAID controllers are not on at that HCL, and a lot of times people don't know that. If you are looking at different solutions, make sure you check compatibility guides, not just for the whole VMware Stack, but including maybe subsets like VSAN, or other tools that you might be using.
We are looking at productizing that and making an offering for our customers, as well as using it internally. We've got it in several labs doing different things, and it's awesome. I really like it. It's resilient, in my opinion. A lot of people say if you only use the three-node minimum recommendation you might have data loss. I had a three-node cluster setup and my switch died, and when I replaced the switch and it came back online, everything was still running just fine, nothing had actually gone down; no data loss, nothing. It's actually really resilient. If you think about your data path, the data locality, it's a lot closer to the CPU, it's right there in that flash recache. It's a resilient storage solution that's cheaper than a dedicated SAN, or something of that sort.
Peer reviews are extremely important to me. I usually start Googling and looking to see, or on Twitter to find other vExperts, or other just subject matter experts that have talked about it: What benefits they've seen, or maybe pitfalls that they've seen. To me, that holds more water than a lot of the White Papers I've seen, because White Papers target maybe a specific use case, but I want to see more broadly: "How does it function? How does it integrate? How stable is it, of all things?" I really value the community involvement and opinion of others when I'm looking at solutions.
View full review »Depending on the size and budget, if there's a smaller shop with less money, and you could get by with just a couple VMs, vSphere would be difficult to recommend. But if you're larger with more money, it’s the best platform for virtualization and cloud integration. VMware is further along than anyone else in this regard.
View full review »Take the time to study vSphere to get to know more about the product. There are a lot of documentation and labs available to help a person develop the skills required to work with vSphere.
View full review »BB
SrEngineer672
Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
- For companies comparing this to Hyper-V, this is still the gold VM solution. While Hyper-V is catching up, it’s still has a way to go.
- For small companies, I really advise to go for Essentials Plus. This gives you proper small scale HA capabilities and it gives you tech support. Essentials provides no technical support.
Definitely have a plan before implementing. Don't rush. It is crucial to think years out so you don't have to redo any architecture because you didn't plan for growth, DR/BC or working out of the cloud. If resources are tight to gather, it would be beneficial to reach out to your favorite consulting team to gather advice.
View full review »
I would recommend this solution to others.
I rate VMware vSphere a nine out of ten.
View full review »EC
reviewer1478514
Database Administrator at a government with 1-10 employees
I've been using the VMware Workstation for eight years, while the VMware vSphere, I've been using for five years.
This solution is deployed on-premises on a physical server for hosting services. Our public server is on a virtual environment.
I'm very satisfied with VMware vSphere.
Deployment of this solution took one day for the supervisor cluster and the virtual machine.
I can't say exactly how many users are using VMware vSphere in our organization, but it's more than 1,000. We have a virtual mail server with 1,000 accounts. We have a website with approximately 200 to 300 visits per day. We also have an internet proxy used regularly by all the internal users to access the internet. We have not measured usage for the DNS server. We have no statistics for it.
We have plans to use other tools from VMware like the vCenter. We have not yet explored it sufficiently, so we use it more. We have plans to use the vMotion to move virtual machines.
My advice to people who plan to use VMware vSphere is to first pay more attention to the materials, e.g. the physical server, because all the virtualization performance resides and depends on that physical server. This means it has to have a good dimension, a good amount of memory and disk space, and a good network controller card. You have to choose a server which is physically robust, strong, and powerful, so you can deploy with the best performance in your virtual environment.
I'm rating VMware vSphere a nine out of ten.
View full review »FD
FelixDiaz
Freelance, Automation Project Administration, DCS, I&E at Centennial Cayman Corp Chile S.A
I rate vSphere 10 out of 10. It's perfect. I know some people are very conservative and don't want to even mess with them, but I would argue that it's a way to avoid risking physical installations or making mistakes in real life. You can do all your testing virtually.
LH
Huy Le Quang
Cloud Professional Architect at FPT Software
I rate VMware vSphere seven out of 10.
View full review »JM
reviewer1126809
Founder at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
I'd recommend the solution to other users. It's a good technology. They're pioneers in the industry.
I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.
View full review »SP
reviewer1515015
General manager at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees
We're end-users and customers.
I'm not sure which version of the solution we're currently on. I don't manage that aspect of it.
Overall, I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We've mostly been very happy with its capabilities.
I would recommend the solution to others.
View full review »AV
reviewer1406361
IT Infrastructure Specialist at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would recommend this solution to new users.
On a scale from one to ten, I would give VMware vSphere a ten.
View full review »SK
SathishKumar
Project Specialist at integra software
I would recommend this solution to anyone who is interested in using it.
I would rate VMware vSphere a ten out of ten.
View full review »ST
Sergei Terekhin
Head of System Architecture Department at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We are a big IT integration company and we do around 80 projects for different customers in my country. We are a partner with VMware. We're one of their software vendors.
We use multiple versions of the solution.
I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
Overall, we've been very satisfied with the solution and its capabilities.
View full review »KS
Kshitij Singhai
Owner at Computech Associates
There is no other perfect solution as compared to this solution. If you want to go for virtualization, there is no other stable and sustainable option.
I would rate VMware vSphere an eight out of ten.
View full review »JL
reviewer1362096
Pré-vendas at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Just follow the documentation. It's very useful and informative. Before you implement, check the licensing, to see if the license is okay and the compatibility metrics are okay. I would rate VMware vSphere 9 out of 10.
View full review »Price is not everything to me. Even though price may put a burden on a company, if you are trying to solve something for your company, the more expensive solution may help you run your environment smoothly. Then, it is worth the expense.
View full review »Start with the least expensive Licensing model and upgrade as you need. Change your operating model to virtualisation and fully leverage its potential. vSphere has it all in one package and can really change the way IT operates. We’re 12 years into virtualisation on x86 and I still find most of the virtualised customers not happy with what it offers since they don’t know how to utilise it.
View full review »It's just made my life so much better as far as being able to move servers around and perform firmware updates during the middle of the day. I love that.
Do your homework so you learn as much as you can about virtualization concepts as there are many nuances that are quite different from the physical counterparts. It’s easy to get an ESXi host stood up and install a vCenter management server – then you decide to stand up a “few” VM’s and when you figure out how easy that is, you are off and running. But what about your network configuration and HA or DRS to name a few. It’s way easier to learn the concepts ahead of time than to have to research a bunch of little issues after the fact. Google VMware and/or vSphere and have at it!
View full review »There’s no better alternative. I would absolutely recommend vSphere. I do think that they’re the most expensive, but well worth the money.
I also think peer reviews would be an interesting way to research, as I haven’t ever encountered a site like IT Central Station before, but I can definitely see the value of moving forward with it.
View full review »FG
reviewer1672974
Systems analyst at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would rate VMware vSphere an eight out of ten.
View full review »MO
reviewer1522935
Operation Engineer at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We are customers and end-users of the product.
We are using the latest version of the solution at this time.
We've just deployed it ourselves, and it is very small. We haven't had any difficulties with it at all so far and it's been five years.
I'd recommend the solution to other organizations.
I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We've been largely very satisfied with the capabilities.
View full review »RK
Rommie Kaputin
IT TECHNICAL/ SERVER ADMINISTRATOR at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would definitely recommend the solution to others working in IT.
I would give the solution a nine but the vMotion feature takes too long for transferring files between stored data sources.
I rate VMware vSphere an eight out of ten.
View full review »SW
reviewer1016370
System Administrator at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
My advice for anybody who is looking into using vSphere is that there are a lot more options out there now, but this product has worked well for me.
The biggest lesson that I have learned from using this product is that it's too easy to create new machines.
I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.
View full review »The built-in features such as encryption - even including TPM module 2.0, are good, but still not useful for us, just because we don't have a lot of requests for this.
The mission-critical applications - more or less all are critical applications. vCenter keeps all the virtual machines of our customers and we don't know what's on those virtual machines. For us, every one of them - not knowing what is inside - is critical. That is for the vSphere used for resources. For the vSphere that we use for management, the critical ones are the infrastructure applications, the ones that keeps the infrastructure working. So from the databases to vCenter itself, to vCloud Director, to NSX. All those machines are critical in that they keep the system working.
As for VMware Cloud on AWS, we have only tested it.
I rate vSphere at eight out of ten. Ten is perfection and I, more or less, never give a ten because people can improve. It's eight, not nine, because I still don't have complete control of the interface.
View full review »This is one of the best products as a virtualization platform. It is important to consider best-practices designing the infrastructure and to put in practice-available features. I think new customers will be pleasantly surprised with the results.
View full review »I’d say, understand what it is you wish to achieve from the outset. Take into account growth, be aware of VM sprawl and the associated license costs – we were all happy to add servers left right and centre, we’ve now been through a server rationalisation process to bring our VM server count down a little. Make sure that your engineers are suitably trained and make sure that you have a good support contract in place – it gives you peace of mind!
View full review »The support could be a bit better. I would do the same thing that I do.
I don’t have a very big network because I’m so busy, but I count on my consultants and information system networks a lot. After, I’ll research a lot on the internet to back up what we’re doing.
View full review »It is necessary to be sure about the systems that will be migrated to a virtualized environment. Although nowadays virtualization is at an advanced stage, some systems still present problems when they are migrated from a physical server to a virtualized one. Systems that require too much performance need to have a different configuration, then it's a necessary study on how to implement them.
View full review »SK
Shams K
Vmware Administrator at Intertech
If you want to reduce your costs, I would recommend going forward with virtualization. I would rate this solution as nine out of ten.
View full review »HI
Hani Ismail
Scrum Master - Digital Marketing at Vodafone
I rate vSphere a nine out of ten. I have a lot of customers using vSphere. I recommend this product for those who are looking into implementing it, but it depends on their needs. There are other similar products I can propose too.
View full review »CM
reviewer807690
Principal Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would recommend this solution to others.
I would rate VMware vSphere a nine out of ten.
View full review »AS
Amgad Soliman
Senior System & Security Administrator at a legal firm with 51-200 employees
I rate vSphere 10 out of 10. I would recommend it to others.
View full review »AO
reviewer1260267
Senior System Administrator at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would recommend this solution and rate it at ten on a scale from one to ten.
View full review »MA
Maan Othman
Senior System Engineer at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
I can recommend vSphere to other users who are looking into implementing it.
I would rate VMware vSphere an eight out of ten.
View full review »DV
reviewer1407546
Senior IT Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We are just customers and end-users. We don't have a business relationship with the company.
It's my understanding that we are using the latest version of the solution, although I don't know the exact version number.
I would definitely recommend this solution to other organizations. For the most part, I've been very satisfied with its capabilities.
I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.
View full review »FT
Fernando Tamariz
Information Technology Specialist at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
In summary, this is a good product and I recommend it because it's resilient and you do not have many products to install.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
View full review »AH
Arshad-Hussain
Director at OPEOPL LISTEN TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.
Overall, I'd rate the solution ten out of ten. Everything it does, it does very well, even among all of the competition that exists in India. However, price-wise, for us, it's not ideal.
I haven't explored much, however, from what I have seen, they really do cover everything.
View full review »JA
Josh Abercrombie
IT Infrastructure Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
It's the only virtual solution I've ever used.
View full review »BS
Bobby Shirley
Desktop Support Specialist at Bank Independent
I would definitely recommend the product.
View full review »TM
ITInfras287c
IT Infrastructure Architect at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The advice I would give is: This is the only solution that you need to evaluate.
I'd have to say that vSphere is a 9 out of 10, just because of its flexibility and ease of use. We can slide in new resources without any impact. We can do maintenance on our clusters without any impact to applications, and we have the flexibility of migrating those workloads to other data centers, when required, in the case of data center downtime.
View full review »If you need to meet your business SLA, then there is no second choice in virtualization to give you peace of mind; it is easy to manage, scalable, stable and has APIs to integrate with all the backup solutions.
View full review »This solution has lots of features. Just be aware of all of them and you will get the most out of it.
View full review »I would recommend analysis of different options and pricing, including public/private-cloud models. Depending on your application and needs, you may not need such an advanced product as vSphere Enterprise.
View full review »I would advise anyone who is interesting in implementing virtualization using VMware's products to try it. We started using the free licensing without support and were extremely satisfied with the ability to rapidly provision resources. We then purchased licensing and support to better manage the environment and have grown to 50 licensed hosts.
View full review »I would advise you to implement it as I believe it's still the best in virtualization for expandability and usability.
View full review »Nothing’s perfect, and they are docked points for moving to a web client. Also, single sign-on is unfriendly, and there were growing pains.
View full review »Yes, we evaluated Hyper-V 2012. From previous experience as well as feedback from the community we decided to move forward with VMware.
View full review »MP
Michael Perry
Vice President at a aerospace/defense firm with 51-200 employees
Plan for more storage than you think, use flash, use 10gbE SFP+ to SANs - well worth it.
View full review »
Assess why you think virtualisation is the answer to your problem. Research hypervisor choices, perform Proof of Concept exercises with those products you choose to assess and most of all think about the legacy of what you're doing. i.e. what do you want to leave behind?
View full review »
Advice:
- VMware is not the only game in town anymore
- Look at your requirements:
- If you are a small to medium shop other server virtualization products may provide what you need
- If you are a large shop I would recommendVMware
View full review »
FP
reviewer1752153
Solutions Architect at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees
My advice to anyone considering using VMware vSphere is you have to find out the requirements. You have to do a very good job finding the requirements so that the scoping and provisioning of the resources are okay. That way you don't have later have to be constantly changing the configuration. It is good to spend some time doing requirements and finding out the loads, etc... that you are going to have to handle.
Generally, VMware vSphere is not perfect, but it's okay. On a scale of one to ten, I will give it an eight.
You get used to the interface. The pricing is getting cheaper, but it depends. Anyway, it is a good product.
View full review »MC
reviewer968889
Administrator at a construction company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would recommend this solution to others.
I rate VMware vSphere a ten out of ten.
View full review »DB
reviewer1596237
IT & Security Team Leader at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
I personally do not recommend Hyper-V based on my experience, but I can recommend others to also look at Proxmox. There is also a solution from IBM. They are, for sure, very good contenders.
I would rate VMware vSphere a nine out of 10. It satisfies our needs.
View full review »SM
reviewer1553184
Cyber Security Technical Engineer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We've been quite satisfied with its capabilities overall. We are very happy with it.
I would recommend the solution to other organizations and users.
Do your homework, figure out what you need. This really relates back to the question about the licensing. Do your homework, find out what version you need, think to the future, and figure out what you might need in five years and invest in that now, because that stepping stone just gets easier and easier if you plan for the future now.
We have not done a lot with the built-in security features. Some of our customers are inquiring about it. That really is their own choice to use. It's not something that we develop products for when we have not begun to use it internally in our own environment, yet. We also do not use VMware Cloud on AWS.
Regarding a performance boost, there is nothing that I've noticed but, to be blunt, it's so robust, we've never pushed it to the max.
As far as simplicity, it is the easiest solution, especially with the vCenter management tools. As far as specific examples, I started way back in the days when we were using the Client, the individual 4 Client, and trying to manage multiple servers was really a headache. The ability to do it all, multiple data centers, multiple areas, from one centralized location, is huge. It's just gotten easier and easier. There are still some areas where it would be nice to be able to find things quicker, but it's improved so much over the last two to three years that it's phenomenal.
It's so versatile, so feature-rich, but there is some of that add-on confusion. What version do I need for this? What licensing do I need for that? What comes free? What doesn't come free? If that was a little cleaner or eliminated entirely - here's your product and everything comes with it - that would probably raise it to at least 9.5; nothing's perfect.
View full review »JL
SystemsAe086
Systems Administrator at a pharma/biotech company with 51-200 employees
Make use of the resources that are there. That's something we failed on when we first started. We started out thinking, "We're going to go with this company for storage, we're going to use Vsphere, etc.," and we just went in with a partner. As I went further along, I learned that there were a lot of built-in resources that I really didn't know I had access to. That was a bit tough.
When selecting a vendor, the most important criterion for us, being a smaller IT department, is the support. Also, to a certain extent, the name is important, because when you're a small department you don't have the opportunity to evaluate as many companies as you'd like to. Sometimes you end up going with the main name brand. When you're a small shop, you need all the help you can get.
I rate vSphere a solid nine out of ten, especially since, with 6.5 and beyond, it has matured and it's full-fledged. It's tough to think of anything I'd want to add to it at this point. I would have rated vSphere 5.5 as an eight out of ten, so it feels like 6.5 is a progression towards ten. There's really no feature that I can explicitly name that would make it a ten. They just need to make more progress, have more stability, and continued simplicity.
View full review »Don't just buy the minimum because you need the best clustering capabilities, which includes having at least one host to be in maintenance mode while the other two are running the business.
I'd also advise that you purchase DRS and HA. For example, with DRS, you don't have to manually balance the load all the time and trying to keep the host balanced out.
Backup is obviously an essential part, so I always recommend Veeam, which works very well with VMware. A lot of people think they can do snapshots on their array and that will be their backup, but it's not. for DR, they can use vCloud Air to copy data offsite so they don't have to deal with traditional tape backup or disk-based backups. Plus, having backups offsite means that viruses like BitLocker won't affect your backups.
I'm very happy with VMware.
View full review »Peer reviews, are very important. I prefer to start with those before I contact the vendors.
View full review »Evaluating migration to vSphere 6.0 in brief. I'm currently taking vSphere 6.0 courses and reading a lot, including writing a lot in my blog about this version. The improvements are really big and we wait more announces in VMware World 2015 very soon.
View full review »I would encourage you to try this solution not just for Labs, but for production and DRP solutions. I know there are many others out there, and some very good ones, but VMware has been evolving in the right direction, and it is still the benchmark for all the others.
View full review »Go ahead and get it as this product is very, very stable.
View full review »
VMware's vSphere is currently THE industry leading virtualization platform. I have been using VMware vSphere and its predecessors for almost ten years now. The core hypervisor continues to lead the industry. At the present time, you cannot go wrong with VMware's vSphere suite. However, competitors are rapidly closing the gap, so watch the market closely over the next few years. I implement business-critical applications on vSphere for all sizes of business almost daily, and am proud to be a virtualization enthusiast. At the moment, VMware vSphere is my hypervisor of choice - without reservation.
View full review »
I would absolutely recommend this solution. I would rate it a nine out of 10.
View full review »UB
reviewer1702059
self-employed
I rate VMware vSphere a nine out of ten.
View full review »BY
reviewer1437084
Manager at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would recommend this solution to others. It is considered to be a leader within the industry.
I would rate VMware vShpere an eight out of ten.
View full review »FW
reviewer1611207
Information Technology Manager & Chief Information Officer at a financial services firm with 1-10 employees
I would rate VMware vSphere a nine out of 10.
View full review »FK
reviewer1390431
Head Of Network & Technical Support at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
I would recommend this solution to others.
I rate VMware vSphere a nine out of ten.
View full review »DA
Daniel Aramayo
Implementation and Support Engineer at PRACSO S.R.L.
I would totally recommend VMware vSphere even though I have some complaints about it. It's one of the great technologies available right now. I would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten.
View full review »MC
reviewer1377360
Line Technical Agent at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.
I would rate VMware vSphere a nine out of ten.
View full review »For a customer who needs to have a stable infrastructure that's scalable, for very critical applications, I recommend vSphere without a doubt. I would also recommend that you request a VMware Partner to design and implement the solution.
View full review »It is a very good solution and it is stable.
View full review »SB
reviewer1347297
Engineering Manager, R&D at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
I would recommend this solution to others. It is one of the best tools.
I rate VMware vSphere a nine out of ten.
View full review »VH
reviewer1363245
CIO at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would recommend this solution. I would rate VMware vSphere a ten out of ten.
View full review »JS
NetworkA3fbb
Network Administrator at a mining and metals company with 201-500 employees
We are just learning about VM Encryption, TPS, and VBS right now. We just moved to VMware ESX 6.7. While I don't have a lot of experience in it yet, but we're looking to implement them.
Since we have had VMware, we've had no problems with it. It's easy to manage. It works very well. Other competitors may not offer as much. You can do a lot with VMware. You get different plugins, so it's a great product. Just go with it.
Most important criteria when selecting a vendor:
- Cost
- Stability.
Do as much up-front planning as possible. Make sure you analyze the IOPs of your servers and plan for computing power, bandwidth and redundancy.
Take into consideration whether the DR and backup solution can support the new environment.
Check into whether the operating systems being used can be virtualized and whether the application will work in that space.
View full review »Definitely do your research. Leading into something, you don't just want to listen to just sales. You would like to know what the industry is giving, and in the case of this product, there is an enormous wealth of information, a wealth of community out there from which you can draw information to get a feel for kind of what you want to do, completely outside of the sales channel. Beyond that, it is probably beneficial to do something like a large-scale licensing unit to be able to get the kind of features that, on a larger scale, deployment is going to need.
View full review »I have not tested Virtual Volumes. That's why I'm here, to learn more about the Virtual Volumes feature along with the NSX platform. I'm excited about it because we have a huge SAN infrastructure where we would like to be able to move workloads from point A to point B and I think that's a good starting point.
I've seen a lot of hypervisors out there, but 10, hands down, in the market.
If I were to recommend this particular product to some of my peers or co-workers or somebody else in another industry, I would clearly state the reliability, the stability, and the ease of use, is which they would fall in love with and they're always innovative. I mean, that's what we love. Every year, we come back to the conference and you learn something new. There's always some good takeaways.
Typically, I would like to hear from the source. I always find myself as an IT technical resource. I tend to like to talk to the people that's actually doing the work and I like to read some of the guys that have the hands-on experience. I don't go out and read a bunch of documents or books per se. I like to engage with the resources that have actually deployed, implement it, because those are your viable resources that have the hands-on experience.
Peer reviews are important but not the highest. There are a few groups I look to specifically, one of which is Spiceworks, but I respect the people I’ve dealt with.
View full review »It's a good solid product. If I had to virtualize anything, it would be my choice and and would use anything like MS Hyper-V.
Make sure hardware on compatability matrix that VMware uses, because if use something not on list, will run into driver issues unnecessarily. And if planning a brand new data center, those are things you want to look at.
View full review »Plan it properly and skip 5.1 if possible. I would avoid 6.0 until Update 1 is out, so any initial bugs can be ironed out.
View full review »Before installing this product, try to design all the components, and don't be shy asking for comparisons or sharing your experience. Often design guidelines are the result of customer implementations, and different points of view. Before bringing it into production in your environment, execute hardening procedures.
If you are working for an ISP, where network admin rules an IT organization, try to get control of all networking devices connected to all services provided by your platform. Often, ISP network administrators are specialized in internet networking, and often they don't know data center networking issues and design impacts.
One of the worst savings to do when trying to consolidate, is to use less networking devices; for this reason I suggest you never play around with them when you need to use eight interfaces per host. If you need them there is no reason to have less than you have asked.
View full review »Go ahead and implement it as you will enjoy using it.
View full review »First try this product, evaluate the infrastructure sustainability, and purchase the correct license that fits your needs.
View full review »Give Hyper-V a chance and look very well into the pricing model. Make sure your storage and network is prepared for a high load with a small footprint
View full review »
All in all, it is an excellent solution that I have deployed in multiple locations and organizations.
View full review »
As of now, OracleVM (formerly known as VirtualBox), is an excellent solution that is open-source and freely available for download.
View full review »
PM
reviewer1739175
VMware PSO Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
View full review »LO
Luca Olivotto
Senior System Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
This is a good solution and I will recommend it. They are choosing a good product.
I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.
Contract only experts or use an external consultant.
Its important to have experience with VMware products, and licensing is not very cheap.
View full review »We always look at responsiveness, availability, and willingness to work on a partnership when choosing a provider. I believe we continuously still look at updates, and sadly we still have some Hyper-V. It’s hard to cost justify switching over for vSphere, as Windows Data Center is just so cheap. But vSphere is definitely better if you ignore costs.
If I’ve never worked with a product, and I’m comparing apples to apples across the board, I definitely have to look at what peers are saying in helping me reach my decision.
View full review »We were seeking a green and an efficient solution for our datacenter. We found vSphere to be a great product and decided to become their customer.
When working with vSphere, I think you always have to take three things into consideration:
- Know your system requirements - are there any compatibility issues, or performance impacts etc.
- Monitor the current physical infrastructure so you have a specific resource consumption, and can then develop the best investment plan
- Make a transformation plan from the physical infrastructure to the virtualized one
All these features mean that VMware Server is a great platform for personal experimentation or light business use. I've personally had a VMware Server host with a couple guest machines running continuously since 2009.
View full review »
One of the cutting edge virtualization technologies offered by VMware works on platforms like Windows, Linux, and Solaris. It facilitates an application developer to test applications on virtual machines with ease of configuration and management. It provides visibility at each and every level of virtual infrastructure.
View full review »
VMware vSphere is a good solution, but we are looking for ACI opportunities.
My advice to others is when you are looking for a solution, look for a vendor in the county you live in.
I rate VMware vSphere a nine out of ten.
View full review »MS
Mohab Samy
VMware Technician Manager at VAS
I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.
I would rate VMware vSphere a nine out of ten.
View full review »TC
reviewer1109874
Solutions Specialist at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
I would recommend using a certified skilled implementation team. It can be difficult if you do not have the experience.
I rate VMware vSphere a nine out of ten.
View full review »VC
reviewer1381863
CEO at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
I would definitely recommend this solution to others. It is a very good product. It is very stable, so your infrastructure uptime can be better. The manual cost of your infrastructure can be less if you use vSphere.
I would rate VMware vSphere an eight out of ten.
View full review »SM
ITProfes763a
IT Professional with 5,001-10,000 employees
Test it, give it a try, and see how it goes. Definitely try it.
For me, the most important criteria when looking for a vendor are
- reliability
- ease of use
- customer support.
I would rate it at eight out of 10 because there is still room for improvement. However, we are not using the full extent of the product so I might be wrong. There is some room for improvement in the ease of use.
View full review »I think that the solution with vSphere is complete.
View full review »You should at least try this product once.
View full review »My advice would be to go for it. VMware has a wide range of products. Try them :)
View full review »I would recommend it, as it's very stable and robust. Make sure you stay current, and up to date.
View full review »It’s incredibly mature and simple. It’s one of those things where you say “why not?”
View full review »Spend time learning the product before going into production. Buy the vCenter software. That is a must.
View full review »Probably the availability of training is the most important thing to look at when choosing a vendor. It’s not perfect but it’s pretty good, and VMware is great.
Peer reviews are pretty important, it’s an easy way to look at hands on market research that you don’t have to pay for, to be honest.
Compatibilities with software, with OS, we have some applications that are only running on XP and 32 bits. You need to do some research to make it work.
View full review »It’s been great. I would recommend it all the time, it’s great. Peer reviews are quite important, as I need to know what others are experiencing before I do.
View full review »It costs a lot. You should go to a VMware 6 course.
View full review »
It works very well.
View full review »
Don't be intimidated by all the possible functions and comparison reports out there. Look what is needed for your requirements and match to available editions. Also when looking into costs, take the whole into account (not just initial costs, but also consolidation ratios, managebilty and the returns you get from those.)
View full review »
This makes sense for smaller companies that are looking to start the consolidation process, or smaller divisions of large companies.
View full review »
MP
sumodirjo
Senior Site Infrastructure Engineer at Kurungsiku
Not the best choice if you want to start learning virtualization. You better choose VMware Player, or VirtualBox if you want to run virtualization software on your desktop or VMware vSphere Hypervisor and XenServer Free edition if you want a free virtualization software on a dedicated machine.
View full review »
MU
reviewer2263155
Lead Security Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
VMware vSphere's community is good. I recommend using the product if you are in the initial career phase and need to deploy a few virtual machines for testing purposes. For more extensive virtualization needs in a production environment, especially when dealing with many VMs, opting for VMware ESXi, its upgraded version, would be a prudent choice. I rate it eight out of ten.
View full review »YB
Yan BENOIST
Entrepreneur at WindiS
We are implementors and our customers don't sometime have any dedicated IT guy. But, as vSphere works well once implemented, there's relativally less to do.
View full review »SM
Stephen Murcott
System Administrator at j5 Software South Africa
Linode, AWS and Digital Ocean now use KVM
View full review »Buy it, and you will be hard pressed to find a better combination, but you need to understand it, and have a plan. As simple as it is, don’t just go out and buy.
View full review »This software is just another tool to get things done. Ensure that you have laid out your requirements and have carefully evaluated your priorities before acquiring a cloud solution.
View full review »RR
Engineer353
VMware Engineer at a tech company with 501-1,000 employees
Overall, I strongly recommend this product.
View full review »I would have preferred to implement vSphere straight away instead of OVM and then switching.
View full review »You should work with an existing VMware partner to deploy, but seek proper training or coursework for day to day management.
View full review »If you don’t have it, you need it because everything should be virtualized.
View full review »I would tell say that if you have the money you should buy the solution and go with blades. Also, make sure you do a lot of number crunching to show that the solution is valuable.
View full review »Always have a plan for the work document everything.
View full review »BK
Barna Kosa
IT Services Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
I rate VMware vSphere a nine out of ten.
View full review »CT
Costinel Tunsoiu
Database Administrator at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
I would recommend this solution. It's robust, it's working and it's easy to use.
I would rate VMware vSphere a ten out of ten.
View full review »MM
reviewer274092
Vice President with 1-10 employees
I would advise others to go with this product if they want to scale their enterprise, definitely if there is no budget constraint.
View full review »If you want to sleep well, get vSphere.
View full review »Make sure you have good SysAdmins who have experience with VMware, as this will save money.
View full review »JL
Jose Vladimir Leon Higueras
Virtualization Solutions Specialist at datec
I would rate this product as nine out of ten.
View full review »NW
reviewer1487706
Head of Technical at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
I would recommend it to potential users.
On a scale from one to ten, I would give VMware vSphere a nine.
View full review »MW
ITManageb049
IT Manager at a construction company with 51-200 employees
Do not look at Microsoft.
View full review »Do a PoC and compare it to other solutions.
View full review »It's easier to deploy if you have someone very knowledgeable. Use peer reviews; they're very important.
View full review »It lose points because it lacks color coding, the web client is clunky, and the interface itself makes it harder to find stuff.
You should run the SQL scripts outside the intial install, cluster SQL, cluster vCenters and run as VMs, and set DR rules to match.
View full review »Its the most production ready virtual platform.
View full review »For small-to-medium business, I would recommend to install ESXi on USB stick or SD card. It provides more flexibility and lower cost to setup the virtual platform.
View full review »
Now I lead the Upgrade to vSphere 5.1 project in my Company. SSO installation are strange... need to involve DBA in this process. Scripts are not good... This installation must be re-produced. But new features are very great and interesting.
View full review »
ZB
reviewer1468668
Executive Director at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
This is a good product and I recommend it.
I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.
View full review »RT
reviewer1351206
Directeur Production, Infrastructure et Architecture IT at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would recommend it for big enterprises. I would rate VMware vSphere a nine out of ten. It is the best solution.
View full review »SJ
reviewer887736
Professional ICT at a non-tech company with 11-50 employees
VMware is a safe solution and it's a stable solution. I would recommend it.
The most important criterion when selecting a vendor is integration. VMware has the most support for other software solutions, such as backup. That's important to me.
I would rate VMware at eight out of 10. It's good but it's too expensive.
View full review »I would recommend evaluating the features that match what you need before deciding. Use the 60 day trials to test.
View full review »Understand your requirements and see how it fits in, especially with Hyper-V as a competitor. Take into account third-party support.
View full review »It just works. Just get it. There are other hypervisors, but the amount of time you put into it to get your job done, you’re going to save money on the back end with vSphere.
View full review »Nothing is perfect, and something will always have an issue.
View full review »You can't go wrong with VMware. The stability and the flexibility it allows, they do it best compared to competitors.
Peer reviews are fairly important, but I try to form my opinion from a POC over anything else.
View full review »
It is also recommend to get a reliable partner for integrating the software with the hardware system. As vSphere has numerous features, an inexperienced integrator or un-trained in-house administrator might not be able to configure fully all features necessary to maximize the product.
View full review »
This is a very good product for small business or community organizations.
I would rate this solution an eight out of 10.
NB
reviewer1445340
Director Global Security at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
Basically, this is a good solution and most of the features are already there. I can recommend it to others. That said, I would like to see better performance.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
View full review »CR
Carlos Rodriguez
Pre-sales engineer
I advise anyone looking to use this solution to take the VMware webinars to familiarize themselves with the product.
View full review »PC
WindowsSbd99
Windows Systems Administrator with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would absolutely recommend it. vSphere has been at the last two jobs that I've had and it's solid.
It's a definite nine out of 10. I'm not sure that there's anything out there that would be better. Microsoft has a hypervisor but I think VMware is more feature-complete.
View full review »You need to place more time into the design phase. You should also build higher spec servers in order to save costs on the licensing.
View full review »It's a good product, but you have to be patient with it when an issue arises.
View full review »It's important that you understand the technology before using it.
View full review »We must meet a real-switch behavior and functionalities. Go ahead and definitely purchase it.
View full review »Don’t hesitate, and go get it. From an architecture perspective, plan out a typical deployment, but you need to understand the business requirements and challenges, be able to define requirements, and make sure you choose the right-size server farm.
View full review »Make sure you get training on use, and deployment because you won’t know what you’re getting into.
View full review »Make sure you get training on its use and deployment, because you won’t know what you’re getting into.
View full review »Stick with vSphere as long as they don't screw up the product.
View full review »JC
reviewer1738062
Technical manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
I rate VMware vSphere a ten out of ten.
View full review »SY
reviewer1314750
Technical Manager at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees
I would recommend this solution to others who are considering it.
It is quite simple to use. The installation is simple and it is stable. I would rate VMware vSphere a nine out of ten.
View full review »It is easy to manage the solution. It is scalable and very stable.
View full review »Think of the entire environment when making this decision - deployment, storage, backups, etc.
View full review »We didn't have any problems. If you're starting to use vSphere solutions, I guess the first thing you should do is check hardware compatibility list to make sure that all your hardware is going to be compatible with your software. After that, if you run into any problems, just check the VMware knowledge base. Basically all the information you'd need is in there.
View full review »Look at the scalability and pricing, as well as the ease of implementation.
View full review »Access the enormous amount of virtual apps they have to get practical performance instead of just the KB to deploy.
View full review »Peer reviews are pretty important, more so than online resources.
View full review »
Since I don't have experience with other solutions, except Vmware, I like it and recommend others who are looking for such a solution to consider talking to VMware.
View full review »
A major issue with this server is that there are several free solutions offered. These are very appealing because of the virtualization rollout that cuts costs. If your intention is to decrease costs by using the VMware Server instead of several machines for several servers, the horsepower of the VMware hardware should be very powerful or every virtual machine will experience a mess.
View full review »
Make sure you have a lab for testing.
View full review »DL
virtuali332868
Virtualization Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
- Make sure you have a strategy so you could utilize a hybrid cloud solution as you grow.
- Build your segments as managers and users
- Look beyond licensing cost and calculate administration and support time
- Make sure you have a good naming strategy that can scale - I had a customer that named his hosts after the seven sins in the bible, so when he needed to grow beyond seven hosts he had to invent an eighth.
Review the SLAs with customers and provide several options describing cost/benefits to them.
View full review »IC
reviewer1379943
Product Management & Business Development Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
I rate VMware vSphere an eight out of ten.
View full review »DN
reviewer935562
Senior Buyer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
The solution is cloud-based.
There are around four people using the solution in our organization.
I rate VMware vSphere as a seven out of ten.
Stop looking at others solutions and implement vSphere 6. It is hands down the most robust, scalable and easy to use virtual infrastructure out there today.
View full review »You should use vSphere for robust performance and stability.
View full review »Nobody’s perfect, but it’s great for our needs, and I would absolutely recommend the product.
View full review »I think as a company VMware is committed to innovation and stability and from a setting up the environment standpoint, you want consistency, but from what we’ve seen VMWare has that.
View full review »RR
Engineer353
VMware Engineer at a tech company with 501-1,000 employees
From my personal experiences I've found that it’s still the leading hypervisor on the market.
View full review »DL
virtuali332868
Virtualization Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Though this is an expensive solution it has great functionality, do not try and go too cheap or it will end up costing you more in the long run.
I rate VMware vSphere a nine out of ten.
View full review »RT
Ruddy TSHILUMBA
Network and Systems Administrator at Ishango-it
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Choose VMware to gain the proper stability, scalability, and flexibility with premium support.
View full review »Peer reviews are significant, but you can tell the most from firsthand experience.
View full review »
This gives the technology lovers an opportunity to do all the things they want or need to do at the same time.
View full review »
The downside to the free version is that you can only use it on a server with a maximum of 32GB memory. Also, you cannot manage multiple ESXi instances with the management client. You have to log-in individually to each server running the free version of EXSi. These limitations are surely a setback considering other competing products do not have these limitations and even offer features which are only available in paid versions of VMware.
View full review »
Nothing to be afraid of. Everything about vSphere is advantageous.
View full review »It's a simple to use solution, and along with fast implementation, you can install it and run it, so have fun.
View full review »ES
reviewer1333554
Senior Presales Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
I would advise others to go ahead with this solution. It is a very functional product. Only its price needs improvement.
I would rate VMware vSphere an eight out of ten.
View full review »AU
ReviewerU8183
Principal Consultant at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
VMware alone cannot offer all the features that customers require. There are times when the differential cost of the customer is not feasible. In addition, there are times when the requirements, in terms of API, build up and the connectivity to the outside world is more important. People need to decide on their own whether this is a good solution or if an OpenStack solution is the better choice.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
VMware vSphere
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about VMware vSphere. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.